Industry super funds outperform retail funds over the long-term

Peter Terlato 13 September 2016

Superannuation golden nest egg

Differing investment philosophies and strategy to blame.

New research has revealed Australia's retirement savings pool would have been $105 billion better off if retail funds matched industry fund returns over the last two decades.

An analysis of Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (APRA) and SuperRatings data by Industry Super Australia (ISA) found that over a 19-year period Australia's total superannuation savings would have been 5% higher if bank-owned and retail fund returns were the same as those dispersed by not-for-profit funds.

For example, someone with a starting balance of $20,000 could have been $36,000 better off.

The analysis identified two key attributes that set industry funds apart from retail funds.

The first is a sound investment philosophy. Industry funds pursue a long-term investment in the real economy, with more than $20 billion currently producing stable returns.

The second is fund structure and governance. Bank-owned funds pay above-market rates for services provided but aren't always passing on scale benefits to its members.

ISA CEO David Whiteley said underperformance of retail funds hurts the Australian economy.

"Bank-owned and retail super funds are a drag on Australia's retirement incomes and national savings," he said.

The analysis forms part of ISA's submission to the Productivity Commission's review of superannuation.

Eight million Aussies don't actively select their own super fund, instead relying on default super accounts.

If you're looking to switch funds, consolidate your super, better manage your self-employed savings or take out income protection for your nest egg, it's best to compare options and make the right decision.

Picture: Shutterstock

Ask a Question

You are about to post a question on

  • Do not enter personal information (eg. surname, phone number, bank details) as your question will be made public
  • is a financial comparison and information service, not a bank or product provider
  • We cannot provide you with personal advice or recommendations
  • Your answer might already be waiting – check previous questions below to see if yours has already been asked

Disclaimer: At we provide factual information and general advice. Before you make any decision about a product read the Product Disclosure Statement and consider your own circumstances to decide whether it is appropriate for you.
Rates and fees mentioned in comments are correct at the time of publication.
By submitting this question you agree to the privacy policy, receive follow up emails related to and to create a user account where further replies to your questions will be sent.

2 Responses to Industry super funds outperform retail funds over the long-term

  1. Default Gravatar
    stephen | September 20, 2016

    How do government superannuation funds compare to Industrial and Retail

    • Staff
      Clarizza | September 21, 2016

      Hi Stephen,

      Thanks for your question.

      Typically, Industry funds are run to benefit its members and also have lower fees while Retail funds are owned and run by large financial institutions and may pay commissions to financial advisers. There are definitely pros and cons to consider for both. We recommend taking a look at the dedicated pages on these: Industry Super Funds and Retail Super Funds.

      Government super funds were designed for employees of Federal and State government departments and so come with benefits specifically for these employees. Like Industry funds, profits typically benefit the members.

      Please note, we are a comparison website and as such, provide general advice only.


Ask a question