Finder makes money from featured partners, but editorial opinions are our own.

5 reasons why the new Ethereum ASIC miner is (probably) worthless

shutterstock computer fire tech 450x250

The expected returns from the $800 Bitmain E3 Ethash ASIC miner are less than zero.

ASIC mining has taken over bitcoin and consolidated its hashing power into just a handful of different pools and companies. It's a fate that most other coins would rather avoid, to avoid potentially dangerous centralisation of their networks while also ensuring that mining is at least somewhat viable for individuals.

Ethereum has long-resisted ASIC mining, so Bitmain's announcement of the world's first Ethash Ethereum ASIC miner, the Bitmain Antminer E3, is making waves. It aims to deliver a hash rate of 180 Megahash on Ethereum's EthHash, making it about 6 times faster than the Nvidia Geforce 1080 which tends to do about 30 Megahashes.

With a similar price to the Geforce 1080, it might look like a steal. Unfortunately, anyone brave enough to pick one up will almost certainly end up losing money.

Expected ROI: Less than zero

The first reason is that even in perfect conditions you're still looking at a very unexciting ROI.

According to NiceHash, WhatToMine and CryptoCompare, the miner will earn about US$5.50 per day on EthHash. Let's generously round that up to $6 and then very generously assume you're not paying anything at all for electricity. Let's also generously assume you're the only person in the world who bought one, so there's no increase in Ethereum mining competitiveness.

In an impossibly best case scenario you're looking at 133 days to break even.

But while Bitmain will happily take your money today, the gear won't be shipping until 16-31 July. Assume you somehow manage to get it right away on 16 July, run it under those impossibly good conditions starting immediately and you won't break even until 26 November. Under real world conditions you'd almost certainly be waiting until 2019 for a profit.

This is a problem, because there's a decent chance of this miner being obsolete before it even ships, and super obsolete 6 months after that.

Four more reasons

There are four key reasons why ASIC miners won't have a chance on Ethereum, especially when there's so much lead-in time.


It might not work as promised. The EthHash algorithm needs a lot of memory, and regardless of whether you're mining with a GPU or an ASIC, those storage requirements are the main bottleneck. Developer Nick Johnson told CoinDesk that ASIC doesn't seem to have any improvements that would boost its performance that much higher than the GPUs used today.


Ethereum plans to migrate to a proof-of-stake system with the Casper upgrade. This will render the E3 completely useless. You can do other things with a GPU, but an ASIC miner that can't mine anything is just an expensive paperweight.

There's no revealed timeline for this update, but it went into testnet at the start of 2018 and many people seem to expect it sometime in late 2018 or early 2019. Even in near-perfect conditions a miner would still be extraordinarily hard pressed to make a buck from their rig before that hard deadline.


The mining rewards will be sharply cut before then, as Ethereum enters its hybrid PoS/PoW mode. Current specifications will see mining rewards cut by 80% in this period. If it's almost impossible to make your money's worth under current rewards and perfect conditions, there's no chance at a fifth of the mining rewards.


The vast majority of the Ethereum community simply doesn't want ASIC mining on the network. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin has previously said that ASIC miners are a threat to decentralisation, and it seems like the vast majority of Ethereum users would happily stomp out ASIC mining with a hard fork if needed.

Despite the community interest in vigorously eliminating any ASIC presence from the Ethereum network, it likely won't be necessary with Casper on the horizon.

"I'm not convinced it's worth expending resources caring too much, except to push faster on Casper," Buterin said in a developer chat in February.

And if it comes to it, there are easier ways to render ASICs useless than a hard fork. "Poisoning the well," as it's been called in proposals, might be an easy enough way to stymie ASICs without getting side-tracked by bricking them outright with a hard fork.

Unlike bitcoin, the Ethereum network can carry a wide range of different transaction types, which offers a solid natural protection against highly-specialised ASIC miners. But if a certain type of computation (ASIC) should become prevalent anyway, conventional miners can simply introduce a large number of ASIC-unfriendly contracts into the network to clog the pipes of ASIC miners, while still allowing the more prevalent and general-purpose GPU miners to do their thing.

And as long as enough people, or just one person with enough time and resources on their hands, decides to poison the well, there's little anyone can do to stop them. On the other hand, if anyone really wants to try their luck with the E3 then there's little anyone can do to stop them from trying.

Disclosure: At the time of writing the author holds ETH, IOTA, ICX, VEN, XLM, BTC, NANO

Disclaimer: This information should not be interpreted as an endorsement of cryptocurrency or any specific provider, service or offering. It is not a recommendation to trade. Cryptocurrencies are speculative, complex and involve significant risks – they are highly volatile and sensitive to secondary activity. Performance is unpredictable and past performance is no guarantee of future performance. Consider your own circumstances, and obtain your own advice, before relying on this information. You should also verify the nature of any product or service (including its legal status and relevant regulatory requirements) and consult the relevant Regulators' websites before making any decision. Finder, or the author, may have holdings in the cryptocurrencies discussed.

Latest cryptocurrency news

Picture: Shutterstock

Ask a Question

You are about to post a question on

  • Do not enter personal information (eg. surname, phone number, bank details) as your question will be made public
  • is a financial comparison and information service, not a bank or product provider
  • We cannot provide you with personal advice or recommendations
  • Your answer might already be waiting – check previous questions below to see if yours has already been asked

Finder only provides general advice and factual information, so consider your own circumstances, or seek advice before you decide to act on our content. By submitting a question, you're accepting our 1. Terms Of Service and 6. Finder Group Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Go to site