Weiss cryptocurrency ratings begin on 24 January 2018

Andrew Munro 22 January 2018 NEWS

shutterstock cryptocurrency bitcoin markets 738x410

Weiss Ratings says the upcoming cryptocurrency scores "may come as a surprise to some people."

The independent Weiss ratings agency will be turning a lens on cryptocurrency on 24 January, with the release of its inaugural cryptocurrency ratings.

"Many cryptocurrencies are murky, overhyped and vulnerable to crashes. The market desperately needs the clarity that only robust, impartial ratings can provide," said Weiss Ratings founder Martin D. Weiss.

"We’re proud to be the first to bring that benefit to investors — to help them cut through the hype and identify the few truly solid cryptocurrencies. Our ratings are based on hard data and objective analysis. But they're bound to create controversy, including some grades that may come as a surprise to some people."

Coins due for grading include bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, Litecoin, NEM, Cardano, Stellar Lumens, IOTA, EOS, NEO, TRON, Dash, Bitcoin Gold, Bitcoin Cash and other well-known cryptocurrencies.

How the ratings work

The Weiss ratings will analyse thousands of data points on each coin’s technology, usage, and trading patterns to reveal which coins might offer the safest returns, the best protection against a market crash and more.

"We are applying our 46 years of accuracy and independence to cryptocurrencies," its statement reads. "The Weiss Cryptocurrency Ratings can also be a vital selection tool for consumers holding cryptocurrencies to buy goods and services, for merchants accepting payment in cryptocurrencies, and for any entity seeking to raise money via cryptocurrencies," its statement reads.

Is it really independent?

Founded in 1972, Weiss Ratings doesn't accept payments from the companies it rates. It says previous research has found its predictions of financial distress to be more accurate than those of Standard & Poor's and other prominent agencies.

Cryptocurrency is less conventional though. If it turns out that anyone involved in the Weiss scoring has a substantial stake in the coins being graded, would that cast doubt on the results? In the absence of clear regulations this remains a philosophical rather than a legal question.

As long as the grading methodology is transparent, people might find the information to be useful in much the same way that decentralisation and transparency are some of the main benefits of blockchain technology in general.

Disclaimer: This information should not be interpreted as an endorsement of cryptocurrency or any specific provider, service or offering. It is not a recommendation to trade. Cryptocurrencies are speculative, complex and involve significant risks – they are highly volatile and sensitive to secondary activity. Performance is unpredictable and past performance is no guarantee of future performance. Consider your own circumstances, and obtain your own advice, before relying on this information. You should also verify the nature of any product or service (including its legal status and relevant regulatory requirements) and consult the relevant Regulators' websites before making any decision. Finder, or the author, may have holdings in the cryptocurrencies discussed.

Latest cryptocurrency news

Picture: Shutterstock

Latest crypto guides

Ask an Expert

You are about to post a question on finder.com.au:

  • Do not enter personal information (eg. surname, phone number, bank details) as your question will be made public
  • finder.com.au is a financial comparison and information service, not a bank or product provider
  • We cannot provide you with personal advice or recommendations
  • Your answer might already be waiting – check previous questions below to see if yours has already been asked

Finder only provides general advice and factual information, so consider your own circumstances, or seek advice before you decide to act on our content. By submitting a question, you're accepting our Privacy & Cookies Policy and Terms of Use, Disclaimer & Privacy Policy.
Ask a question
Go to site