Finder makes money from featured partners, but editorial opinions are our own.

Underperforming super funds on APRA’s radar

man with magnifying glass 450

man with magnifying glass 738

The top 10 performing MySuper products have seen an average return of 3.5% more than those at the bottom of the list.

A ranking of the best and worst performing super funds over the past two and a half years may indicate which funds are on a "hit list" for the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). The ranking shows that the top 10 MySuper funds have seen a 3.5% lead over the bottom 10.

Earlier this month APRA declared it would investigate the worst performing superannuation funds, and while the funds on its hit list are yet to be revealed, it is understood many are not-for-profit.

“The bottom performers we look at pretty closely and we are going to be having conversations with them. A large proportion of those are not-for-profit,” said APRA deputy chair Helen Rowell.

The top 10 performing funds delivered an average annual gain of 8.9% for the two and a half years to December, compared to the bottom 10 which only delivered an average annual return of 5.4%.

super fund performance APRA

As the best performing funds tended to be among the country’s biggest, Helen Rowell unleashed a warning to smaller funds that were underperforming at the annual Conference of Major Superannuation Funds on Friday.

“Operating in what is an increasingly complex environment, trustees need to be aware of and proactively considering how they will respond to the challenges that will arise, now and into the future, to ensure their funds remain 'fit for purpose'.”

“That means having the scale, capacity and resources to deliver on their obligations to members on an ongoing basis, which requires sound planning taking into account a range of plausible scenarios, disciplined monitoring of progress against those plans, and taking prompt corrective action when underperformance is identified. Not all trustees are doing this adequately," Rowell said.

APRA has not stated whether the worst performing funds on the list were on it’s hit list or not, saying it considered a broad range of factors not only limited to the fund’s performance.

Rice Warner consultant Nick Bonarius said that APRA also looked at the number of fees the fund charged and whether or not the fund was achieving its business targets.

"If they have got the trifecta, then APRA will be putting the heat on those funds. Bad performance on its own is not enough to tell a fund it should be merging," Bonarius said.

However, there has been debate about the suitability of APRA’s data in judging a funds' overall performance potential, as many argue two and a half years is not enough time to judge a funds' returns.

BT Financial Group, referring to the ASGARD Independence Plan which it manages, said the APRA data was inaccurate.

"As APRA itself states, comparisons on relative investment performance cannot be made on the basis of its data. This fund was established with a minimum six-year investment timeframe, has only been operating for three years, and has exceeded its performance targets over all time periods," a BT spokesman said.

If you’re interested in comparing super fund options, check out our guide to decide which fund is right for you.

You may also be interested in

Picture: Shutterstock

Get more from Finder

Ask an Expert

You are about to post a question on

  • Do not enter personal information (eg. surname, phone number, bank details) as your question will be made public
  • is a financial comparison and information service, not a bank or product provider
  • We cannot provide you with personal advice or recommendations
  • Your answer might already be waiting – check previous questions below to see if yours has already been asked

Finder only provides general advice and factual information, so consider your own circumstances, or seek advice before you decide to act on our content. By submitting a question, you're accepting our Terms of Use, Disclaimer & Privacy Policy and 6. Finder Group Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

4 Responses

    Default Gravatar
    LauroFebruary 18, 2019

    The spaceship fund should be on the worst performing list as well. I just had huge loses (bigger then the sum of all net earnings from last year and also biting almost 10% of the total balance). I am moving into another fund.

      Default Gravatar
      NikkiFebruary 20, 2019

      Hi Lauro,

      Thanks for getting in touch! Thanks for giving us feedback on your experience on the spaceship fund. Feel free to email back if you have questions.


    Default Gravatar
    StephenSeptember 5, 2018

    How does BT rate in the last year? and are there any costs involved in rolling over your super fund to another fund that is performing better? Thank you.

      AlisonSeptember 6, 2018Finder

      Hi Stephen,

      To see the latest performance figures for BT you’ll need to check its website, as it will depend on which investment option you’re in. You can see the latest performance figures here:

      To switch funds you may be charged an exit fee by BT. Again, this will depend on which investment option you’re in so it’s best to check the PDS online.


Go to site