iPhone tweeted about 1.3 times as much as Android but had 3 times the number of negative tweets
The iPhone 8 had the highest proportion of negative tweets at 56%
The OnePlus 5 received the largest percentage of positive tweets at 63%
The Samsung Galaxy S8 scored the lowest percentage of negative and positive tweets
What can Twitter teach us about smartphones? We analysed over 220,000 tweets about iPhones and Android phones, and used sentiment analysis software to find out which brand is actually winning over the masses.
For our first analysis, we collected 110,675 tweets containing "iPhone" or "Android" to calculate how people actually feel about major phone brands like Samsung, OnePlus, Pixel and Apple. Although the iPhone was tweeted about a third more than Android, proportionally it had three times the number of negative tweets – 26.7% compared to 8.4%.
Total no. of tweets
Positive: negative ratio
3.9 : 1
1.2 : 1
2.7 : 1
Tweets per minute
Tweets per day
Let's break it down by smartphone
Next, we gathered tweets about six of 2017's most talked-about smartphones. If you're trying to decide on a new phone, consulting these 110,890 opinions could help you.
The OnePlus 5 received the largest percentage of positive tweets – 63%.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 received the lowest percentage of negative and positive tweets. Basically, people have no strong feelings one way or the other.
The iPhone X and the Samsung Galaxy Note 8 got uncannily similar sentiment scores.
The iPhone 8 had, by far, the highest proportion of negative tweets – coming in at 56%.
Galaxy Note 8
Positive : negative ratio
0.2 : 1
7.8 : 1
7.7 : 1
9.7 : 1
1 : 1
19.8 : 1
We used Twitter’s search API to collect tweets posted between 27 September and 4 October 2017, in English only, containing matches for the following keywords:
Galaxy Note 8
These tweets were then analyzed using nltk.sentiment.vader – a sentiment analysis software package specifically designed for social media. This program returned a compound polarity score for each tweet between -1 and 1, where a positive result indicates an overall positive sentiment, and a negative result indicates an overall negative sentiment.
Tweets scoring 0.3 and above were considered positive, those scoring -0.3 and below were considered negative, and tweets that fell in the middle were counted as neutral. For each keyword, the number of tweets in each category was divided by the total number of tweets containing that keyword, to give the percentage of tweets about each phone/brand which expressed each sentiment.
Since Twitter does not index every single tweet for search, the figures for the number of tweets per minute were obtained via the streaming API which collects tweets in real-time. Every time a tweet occurred (in any language) mentioning either Android or iPhone, its creation time was recorded. This was run for over sixteen hours from 15:51 on 5 October to 8:06 on 6 October. The total number of tweets gathered was divided by the total number of minutes to get the average tweets per minute. This was then multiplied by the number of minutes in a day, 1440, to get the average tweets per day (rounded to the nearest thousand).
How likely would you be to recommend finder to a friend or colleague?
Very UnlikelyExtremely Likely
Thank you for your feedback.
Our goal is to create the best possible product, and your thoughts, ideas and suggestions play a major role in helping us identify opportunities to improve.
Important information about this website
finder.com.au is one of Australia's leading comparison websites. We compare from a wide set of major banks, insurers and product issuers.
finder.com.au has access to track details from the product issuers listed on our sites. Although we provide information on the products offered by a wide range of issuers, we don't cover every available product. You should consider whether the products featured on our site are appropriate for your needs and seek independent advice if you have any questions.
Products marked as 'Promoted' or "Advertisement" are prominently displayed either as a result of a commercial advertising arrangement or to highlight a particular product, provider or feature. Finder may receive remuneration from the Provider if you click on the related link, purchase or enquire about the product. Finder's decision to show a 'promoted' product is neither a recommendation that the product is appropriate for you nor an indication that the product is the best in its category. We encourage you to use the tools and information we provide to compare your options and find the best option for you.
The identification of a group of products, as 'Top' or 'Best' is a reflection of user preferences based on current website data. On a regular basis, analytics drive the creation of a list of popular products. Where these products are grouped, they appear in no particular order.
Where our site links to particular products or displays 'Go to site' buttons, we may receive a commission, referral fee or payment.
We try to take an open and transparent approach and provide a broad based comparison service. However, you should be aware that while we are an independently owned service, our comparison service does not include all providers or all products available in the market.
Some product issuers may provide products or offer services through multiple brands, associated companies or different labelling arrangements. This can make it difficult for consumers to compare alternatives or identify the companies behind the products. However, we aim to provide information to enable consumers to understand these issues.
Providing or obtaining an estimated insurance quote through us does not guarantee you can get the insurance. Acceptance by insurance companies is based on things like occupation, health and lifestyle. By providing you with the ability to apply for a credit card or loan we are not guaranteeing that your application will be approved. Your application for credit products is subject to the Provider's terms and conditions as well as their application and lending criteria.