LIVE NOW

Tether’s latest fake audit has only made things worse

Posted: 21 June 2018 6:20 pm
News

Tether is quickly going from shady to suspicious to toxic.

Tether has been under frequent accusations of being party to the price manipulation endemic to cryptocurrency, and not actually having the funds to back up its Tether issuances.

It took a stab at addressing these concerns with an independent audit at the start of the year, before abruptly dissolving its relationship with the Friedman LLC accounting firm, saying that it was too slow and expensive.

Its exact words were: "Given the excruciatingly detailed procedures Friedman was undertaking for the relatively simple balance sheet of Tether, it became clear that an audit would be unattainable in a reasonable time frame."

Now it's changed tack by releasing a non-audit it described to Bloomberg as "the next best thing" and saying that it will not be getting an actual audit in the foreseeable future because it can't.

This non-audit was accompanied by some very bizarre statements from a Tether spokesperson, and the emergence of troubling connections between Tether and the law firm it contracted for its fake audit.



This is getting weird

The reason a Tether spokesperson gave is that the cryptocurrency market is too immature for established accounting firms to get into crypto clients.

"The big four firms are anathema to that level of risk," said Tether general counsel Stuart Hoegner.

This is an unusual statement, which some people might even construe as a bare-faced lie, considering that big four accounting firm PwC Hong Kong (Tether's home city) started accepting bitcoin payments last year specifically because it was so closely involved with so many cryptocurrency companies.

Or that Ernst & Young, another big four accounting firm, started accepting bitcoin in 2016. It even developed and provided its own bitcoin wallet app for employees, and installed a bitcoin vending machine in its public office in Switzerland, all to better facilitate transactions with its cryptocurrency clients.

It looks much more like reputable accounting firms are allergic to Tether specifically, rather than cryptocurrency in general.

It's even weirder when you consider that Tether was founded in 2014 and is now well established, and that auditing US dollar holdings – which is what Tether claims to have – is one of the easiest and most straightforward things any accounting firm will typically do.

There's undeniably something very fishy going on, and it smells like Tether.


It gets weirder

Tether contracted the Freeh, Sporkin & Sullivan law firm to perform a brief study of Tethers in circulation, and essentially write a letter saying that Tether has enough funds to back its circulating supply, but not offer any proof.

It's more of a suspicious-looking doctor's note than an independent audit, and by itself, doesn't prove anything, least of all why Tether couldn't find an actual accounting firm to perform what should be a routine procedure.

But in an effort to lend its efforts some legitimacy, Tether made sure to tout the credentials of Freeh, Sporkin & Sullivan (FSS), a firm "established by three former federal judges – including a former Director of the FBI – with decades of experience adjudicating at the highest levels of the U.S. government".

"Judge Eugene R. Sullivan (Ret.), one of the partners, is a member of the advisory board of one of Tether’s banks. It was through this connection that Tether was introduced to FSS."

Eugene Sullivan, who connected Tether and FSS, is a director of a company called Imperial Pacific Holdings. And that former FBI director would be Louis Freeh, who is also an advisor to Imperial Pacific Holdings.

And Imperial Pacific Holdings is known to be running a mathematically improbable casino on the US territory island of Saipan while being battered by reports of human trafficking. It sprung up in 2014 (the same year Tether was founded), and by 2017 had become the most successful casino operation in history, turning over $2 billion a month in supposed VIP bets on US soil. For perspective, that makes it about six times more successful than Macau's finest casinos, which are widely known to be hotbeds of money laundering.

Nothing explicitly ties Tether to Imperial Pacific Holdings. But FSS' business ties and Tether's bizarre decision to get a non-audit from this particular law firm raises some clear red flags.

What happens next?

Probably very little.

Tether has said that it won't be releasing an audit, and barring any criminal proceedings down the line, that's probably that. In the meantime, any questions can be referred to Tether's accountants lawyers.


Disclosure: At the time of writing the author holds ETH, IOTA, ICX, VET, XLM, BTC, XRB

Disclaimer: This information should not be interpreted as an endorsement of cryptocurrency or any specific provider, service or offering. It is not a recommendation to trade. Cryptocurrencies are speculative, complex and involve significant risks – they are highly volatile and sensitive to secondary activity. Performance is unpredictable and past performance is no guarantee of future performance. Consider your own circumstances, and obtain your own advice, before relying on this information. You should also verify the nature of any product or service (including its legal status and relevant regulatory requirements) and consult the relevant Regulators' websites before making any decision. Finder, or the author, may have holdings in the cryptocurrencies discussed.

Latest cryptocurrency news

Picture: Shutterstock

Latest crypto guides

Ask an Expert

You are about to post a question on finder.com.au:

  • Do not enter personal information (eg. surname, phone number, bank details) as your question will be made public
  • finder.com.au is a financial comparison and information service, not a bank or product provider
  • We cannot provide you with personal advice or recommendations
  • Your answer might already be waiting – check previous questions below to see if yours has already been asked

Finder only provides general advice and factual information, so consider your own circumstances, or seek advice before you decide to act on our content. By submitting a question, you're accepting our Terms of Use, Disclaimer & Privacy Policy and Privacy & Cookies Policy.
Ask a question
Go to site