LIVE NOW

Tether admits to not being fully fiat backed

Posted: 15 March 2019 6:59 pm
News

The concession puts price manipulation allegations and Bitfinex insolvency fears back in the spotlight.

Tether has quietly admitted to not being fully backed one to one by US dollars. The admission takes the form of a website update, where it changed a claim of full cash backing to a broader claim of various kinds of backing.


Before

After


Multiple implications

This has several troubling implications.

Refreshed market manipulation concerns

Last year John Griffin and Adam Shams of the University of Texas published a study saying that, based on correlations in market and Tether movements, it's statistically very likely that Tether is being used to manipulate Bitcoin prices.

The clincher is that the study assumes that Tether is not fully backed. Even Tether's chief compliance officer, Leonardo Real, said exactly as much in a recent interview.

"We stand by the fact that all outstanding USDT are backed 1-to-1 by fiat USD," he said. "The entire study relies on the assumption that USDT is unbacked and therefore not sufficiently driven by trader demand."

"To reiterate, the accusation against Tether is based around the assumption that outstanding USDTs are unbacked," Real added, just to really drive the point home.

So, that hasn't aged well.

According to Bloomberg, the authors of the study have been briefing the CFTC on their findings. It's possible that a noose is tightening around Tether somewhere behind the scenes.

Bitfinex and Tether insolvency

The wording of Tether's new claim suggests that its reserves can be composed of just about anything, including cryptocurrency being fronted to Tether by its affiliates such as Bitfinex.

Essentially this suggests that Tether could be backed by cryptocurrency held by Bitfinex. This is concerning, given that Bitfinex's demonstrably enormous cryptocurrency holdings are one of the only things keeping insolvency rumours at bay. If those holdings are meant to be supporting Tether, the situation is quite fragile.

Strange coincidences

This is all being punctuated by strange coincidences of timing.

Do you remember how the markets seemed to have a spontaneous crisis of faith in Tether's backing from mid to late October last year? It was a wild couple of weeks which also saw Tether's circulating supply shrink by about US$1 billion.

In that same timeframe, Bitfinex's top bitcoin wallet was wrapping up the mass departure of around $750 million worth of Bitcoin before going mostly silent.

Bitfinex was unloading its Tether holdings back to the treasury at the same time. On 8 October 2018 it was the second richest Tether holder with over $260 million USDT. But over the next couple of days it dropped $100 million of that. Now, that Bitfinex Tether wallet is down to only $12.5 million.

And more recently, right as Tether updates its website to explain that it may not be fully fiat backed, Bitfinex also announces that it's introducing BTC/USDT and ETH/USDT pairs.

To a paranoid eye, the timing of it all may seem well beyond the bounds of coincidence, and could suggest that Bitfinex has been putting its crypto reserves against Tether since some kind of crunch last October, and is now cutting back its own Tether exposure by pushing it onto customers to take out into the wider ecosystem.

This is driven home by the fact that Bitfinex's usual premiums are in overdrive right now.

When an exchange is showing higher BTC/USD prices than others, it typically means users can't actually cash out USD. This is really driven home here by the fact that Bitfinex's BTC/USDT pair is trading about $100 cheaper than its BTC/USD.

Tellingly, USDT itself is firmly trading at over a dollar on Bitfinex.

What does it all mean?

Despite any assurances to the contrary, market forces and countless user reports make it very clear that you're going to have a tough time getting fiat out of Bitfinex. With the QuadrigaCX incident still fresh in people's minds, this should raise some concerns.

Speaking of which, QuadrigaCX's old fiat payment processor, CryptoCapital, still lists QuadrigaCX as one of its customers on its website after all this time. Bitfinex is also believed to be a CryptoCapital customer.

But it's strange that QuadrigaCX would still be listed there, given how quickly CryptoCapital scrubbed Bitfinex from its customer list when someone pointed out that most of the exchanges supported by CryptoCapital were broke.

There's a lot of weirdness out there.

Disclosure: The author holds ETH and XLM at the time of writing.

Disclaimer: This information should not be interpreted as an endorsement of cryptocurrency or any specific provider, service or offering. It is not a recommendation to trade. Cryptocurrencies are speculative, complex and involve significant risks – they are highly volatile and sensitive to secondary activity. Performance is unpredictable and past performance is no guarantee of future performance. Consider your own circumstances, and obtain your own advice, before relying on this information. You should also verify the nature of any product or service (including its legal status and relevant regulatory requirements) and consult the relevant Regulators' websites before making any decision. Finder, or the author, may have holdings in the cryptocurrencies discussed.

Crypto explained


Latest cryptocurrency news

Picture: Shutterstock

Latest crypto guides

Ask an Expert

You are about to post a question on finder.com.au:

  • Do not enter personal information (eg. surname, phone number, bank details) as your question will be made public
  • finder.com.au is a financial comparison and information service, not a bank or product provider
  • We cannot provide you with personal advice or recommendations
  • Your answer might already be waiting – check previous questions below to see if yours has already been asked

Finder only provides general advice and factual information, so consider your own circumstances, or seek advice before you decide to act on our content. By submitting a question, you're accepting our Terms of Use, Disclaimer & Privacy Policy and Privacy & Cookies Policy.
Ask a question
Go to site