Telstra Signature Premium Review
Telstra’s Signature Premium is a pleasant enough device, it doesn’t push hard enough to be truly "premium".
We’re reader-supported and may be paid when you visit links to partner sites. We don’t compare all products in the market, but we’re working on it!
The Signature Premium was easily the best phone Telstra had put its own branding to, but then the field for that honour was never terribly wide.
- Premium feel
- Fingerprint sensor
- Good camera optics
- Subtle Telstra branding
Could be better
- Mid-range performance
- Battery life fails to impress
Telstra has had countless phones over the years with its own branding stamped upon it, all the way back to rotary dial devices with Telecom logos embedded in the plastic. In the smartphone era, these have always been budget devices pitched at the low-usage, low-cost end of the market.
The Telstra Signature Premium is a different kind of play for the nation’s biggest telco, as it’s a more premium-feeling device. As with previous Telstra-branded efforts, it’s not a device that’s built by Telstra. Instead, it’s a rebadged HTC A9, a device that’s otherwise not officially available in Australia.
|Smartphones||Telstra Signature Premium|
|Processor||Qualcomm MSM8952 Octa-Core|
Upsides: Why you’d want the Telstra Signature Premium
- Premium feel: For a phone with more of a mid-range than high-end price, the Telstra Signature Premium feels good in the hand. It has the same ridged, easy to find power button found on the HTC 10, and the heavy black and grey accents gives it a more serious, professional look.
- Fingerprint sensor: Telstra prices the Signature Premium in the mid-range space, and that’s an area where good fingerprint sensors are few and far between. The Signature Premium’s front mounted fingerprint sensor isn’t the quickest we’ve seen, but for basic biometric authentication it’s entirely serviceable.
- Good camera optics: The Telstra Signature Premium comes with a 13MP rear camera with inbuilt optical image stabilisation. This is becoming more common in premium phones, but less so in what’s a mid-range phone at heart. The use of OIS gives it a slight edge when quickly shooting snaps, although predictably if you push it in low light you’ll get grainy results. The front facing ultrapixel camera works well for selfies in most conditions as well.
- Subtle Telstra branding: The Telstra Signature Premium’s use of specific Telstra branding is nicely understated, with a small Telstra logo on the back and Telstra-specific apps preloaded on the device.
Downsides: Why you might not want the Telstra Signature Premium
- Mid-range performance: Buy a phone with "premium" right in the name, and you could reasonably expect premium performance. While the Telstra Signature Premium isn’t a terribly sluggish phone, it’s also not terribly quick amongst even mid-range phones. Here’s how it compares using Geekbench’s inbuilt benchmark against a range of similarly priced competitors:
Handset Geekbench 3 Single Core (higher is better) Geekbench 3 Multi Core (higher is better) Huawei P9 1736 6357 Huawei Mate 8 1738 6092 LG G5 2305 5243 Sony Xperia Z5 2076 5165 Samsung Galaxy S6 1347 4569 HTC One X9 892 4558 LG G4 1190 3313 Oppo R9 867 3303 Google Nexus 5X 1188 3198 Telstra Signature Premium 745 3116
It’s much the same story when it comes to 3D performance as well:
Handset 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Result LG G5 29597 Sony Xperia Z5 19197 Huawei Mate 8 17947 HTC One X9 16877 Oppo R9 11053 Telstra Signature Premium 9559
Benchmarks don’t tell the full story, and as long as your needs are mid-range, the Telstra Signature Premium should largely satisfy. Premium, however, is not how we could describe its general application performance.
- Battery life fails to impress: The Telstra Signature Premium packs a 2150mAh battery behind its 5-inch display, which isn’t a terribly large amount of power to place in a phone of this size. Predictably, this means that its overall battery life performance isn’t terribly impressive in a comparative sense:
Handset Geekbench 3 Battery Test Duration Geekbench 3 Battery Score Huawei Mate 8 11:14:40 6659 Samsung Galaxy J2 10:05:20 2689 Huawei P9 8:26:30 4948 LG G5 7:36:10 4561 Google Nexus 5X 7:14:20 4062 HTC One X9 7:03:10 3971 Samsung Galaxy S6 6:51:30 4115 Oppo R9 6:41:50 4018 Telstra Signature Premium 5:48:50 3260 Sony Xperia Z5 5:41:30 3414 LG G4 5:27:50 3224
It’s certainly feasible within those figures to get a full day’s battery life out of the Telstra Signature Premium, but only if your usage is moderate.
Who is it best suited for? What are my other options?
The Signature Premium is easily the best phone Telstra’s put its own branding to, but then the field for that honour was never terribly wide. As a straight up mid-range offering it’s perfectly suited to the needs of mid-range users, but this is a particularly competitive field right now.
As such, whether you were looking at the Telstra Signature Premium as an outright purchase option or on contract, it would pay to consider the many other phones available at similar price points, some of which seriously leap ahead of what the Signature Premium is capable of. To throw up just two examples, the Huawei P9 is available at a similar contract price and has a considerably better camera. Outright, we’re seeing the much more powerful LG G5 sold at prices near that of the Signature Premium.
Where can I get it?
Telstra offered the Signature Premium on a variety of 24-month contracts, though it is no longer available on sale.
More guides on Finder
Oppo A94 5G review: Deeply average
The Oppo A94 5G doesn't really do anything wrong for a mid-range handset, but it doesn't really do anything exceptional either.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro review: Incremental improvements make for a superb premium phone
You don't need to upgrade to the iPhone 13 Pro if you're using the iPhone 12 or 11, but if you do, you're going to get a seriously impressive handset.
Motorola Edge 20 review: Thin price meets slender body in a great handset
The Motorola Edge 20 could do with a bigger battery, but it's otherwise a very nicely balanced mid-range phone that impresses with good design, solid app performance and varied camera capabilities.
Motorola Moto G50 5G review: Cheap, but is that enough?
The Motorola Moto G50 5G continues Motorola’s commitment to decent, low cost phones, but it’s outpaced by the 5G competition in its price bracket.
TCL 20 Pro 5G review: TCL’s best fails to keep pace with its competitors
The TCL 20 Pro 5G delivers solid performance for its price range, but you can get a better camera phone for the same price.
Vivo X60 Pro 5G review: A thin and powerful premium phone
The Vivo X60 Pro 5G has its weak points for a flagship premium phone, but many will gladly overlook these issues for its combination of processing power and camera capabilities.
realme C21 review: Colourful, cheap but just too slow
The realme C21 has some attractive style and onboard NFC, but it’s otherwise overshadowed by more powerful phones in the budget space.
Oppo Find X3 Pro Review: Cute microscope, but a phone with lots of catches
The Oppo Find X3 Pro tries a lot of new tricks to entice buyers, which leads to an intriguing, but sometimes frustrating premium handset experience.
Nokia 5.4 Review: Average Android doesn’t quite make the grade
The Nokia 5.4 is a fine phone, but it’s only an average model for its price range, which is something of an odd step backwards for Nokia.
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G Review: Android flagship brilliance
If you can stand the price point, there’s an awful lot to like about Samsung’s highest tier Galaxy S21 handset.
Ask an Expert