AU$329.00 Xbox One S + 4 games
The original internal pitch for Rainbow Six Siege included this piece of medieval art.
Visually, you may notice there’s not a whole lot that’s familiar with Rainbow Six Siege, but in terms of the core concepts, it’s all there: asymmetrical combat with attackers versus defenders; destructibility; distinct roles between factions.
Rainbow Six Siege has been out in the wild for over a year now, and despite a rocky launch, Ubisoft Montreal managed to retain a healthy player base, partially thanks to transparency with the community. It also helped that Ubisoft Montreal refused to split the player base with each subsequent DLC release. Players are able to purchase a yearly season pass but, in terms of content, that only offers two weeks of early access to the new operators, who are automatically unlocked.
For Rainbow Six Siege players who don’t buy a season pass, after the two weeks of exclusivity pass, they can unlock new operators with earnable in-game currency called Renown. On top of this, all players have access to the new maps as soon as they’re released. Where other popular first-person shooters fracture their communities with every subsequent paid DLC drop, Ubisoft Montreal kept its community united, which helped it get through a rocky first year of technical issues, and saw peaks – not declines, like comparable games – with each DLC release.
We recently had the chance to sit down (separately) with creative director Xavier Marquis, then brand director Alexandre Remy, to talk about the past, present and future of Rainbow Six Siege.
(For context, it’s worth noting that both of these interviews started with Marquis and Remy commenting on a red Lucasfilm-branded A5 notebook that we use for interview questions.)
XM: No, not Lucasfilm.
XM: Yes, the Moleskine ones.
XM: Yes, absolutely. Designed the game step by step.
XM:Oh, no. When I started Siege, I wrote everything, and any step of the design, everything, is inside these four books. And I’m an artist by background, so I draw everything since the first day. I draw the barricades, barbed wire, everything, etcetera. Everything has been designed and drawn step by step.
XM: I think it’s at 80 percent.
XM: No, no. It’ll be notes for the future, etcetera. But if I pick, for instance, the first book, the first book is about the first year of development, I think that 80 percent of it is in it, yes.
XM: For year two we are switching format on PC, mainly on PC. The thing we want to do, we want to stop to divide our resources because multiple support, multiple console… PC can be modified directly. I think as a player anywhere the console, support, etcetera, me, if I’m a Rainbow Six player, I will watch if it’s on PC. Me, I think, we are not with eSports event supporting the console or PC, we don’t care; we want to just support only one show. This was the main thing.
So we stop dividing our resources and me, also, I gave advice to Alex [Remy], because when I was at home I watched the final we did, and I think it was a bit confusing to have multiple champions of the world, multiple champions of the season, etcetera. So I said, “No,” in terms of a show, it was too complex, so I said, “No, it’s better to only have one final.”
XM: No, no, no, no. We are planning for a very long time. First, you have to know it’s a real dream internally that we’re able to build characters, we’re able to build operators, and we’re already imagining the reaction from the players. My team of designers are full of Dota players, and stuff like that, so we are living our dream. To react from the meta, from players, we’ve got a specific patch, which is called the Reinforcement Patch.
XM: -Oui, oui! Yes, that’s it. When you’re playing, for instance, StarCraft, you are thinking about what could be potentially the base location of your enemy, etcetera, the weakness, where you have to collect the information before the attack. The attack will be bang, and that’s all.
This game [Siege] has been designed for the things… instead of just being roaming and finding my enemy and having a reflex game, everything is there to collect information. The information will limit your casualties, it will limit the pro ability, and as soon as you read the information you will dominate your enemy. It’s designed for that.
XM: For the [mid-season] Reinforcements [patch], it’s only based on the released operators, never a new one. The [start of a] season releases a new one, and then the Reinforcement Patch is only dedicated to the past of the game. The patch is only dedicated to the past. It’s always to maintain the existing operators in this meta. So with the new system, it will change the meta, it will modify the meta, and then in the Reinforcement Patch, it’s a specific patch that’s there to maintain all of the existing operators.
And when it comes to hardcore players, in tournaments in the past, in Siege they’re looking for a competitive edge and there are times when they might take advantage of glitches and things like that.
XM: For instance, often we can just fix the glitch, but if it’s the case that we have to fix it hurriedly before the competition, the teams don’t have enough time to learn about it, or we can also ban. So, for instance, if an operator is not working because of some glitches, the competition can ban, directly, part of the content, so an operator is not available, etcetera. This one is not going to play.
XM: No, no, no, no. Today, still internally, we are thinking about a lot of things. You have no idea about all the potential topics we are exploring. We have also a lot of phases, for instance, specifically for this feature; but why not have no time at all? So as soon as you get out, you can be detected and stuff. Yes. But we need to be patient.
It’s something that we learnt from a different point of view. We learnt that, oh, okay, it’s better to take a bit of time, play test it internally, do a lot of tests instead of trying it directly on the community. We want to take the time also and release it so it’s meaningful for the community. And doing some tests that, yes, trust me, we are exploring tonnes of things, even on the operators, a lot of tests or things we are noticing every day that we want to explore. The operator system, trust me, it’s insane for that.
XM: We are talking about IQ every season. We know because of some new operators, we know that IQ will always be more meaningful because she will detect their stuff. But we know it’s not finished. We’ve got a theory about how we want to envisage, etcetera. Some operators from the original design were a bit too simple, only one layer, like IQ detects and stuff. But we’re thinking about the different ideas, avenues to explore, we are looking for operators with different layers, maybe a skill with different layers of readability of how to use it. I don’t want to talk too much about it because I want to be sure and secure about the design, but honestly, the future will be extremely fun.
XM: No, it’s not only about IQ. No, no, no.
XM: Today, I cannot say how we’re going to modify her, but I’ve been talking with my team about Twitch, already, because I think some things would be rather interesting, as a team we’ve got a lot of things to do, so for another operator also Thatcher. We have a lot of discussions with Thatcher.
XM: Okay, you know what? It’s not official because it cannot come only from me, but it’s my dream to have Australia in our map for the seasons in the future.
XM: Year three . Why not?
XM: So this one is not an easy one, and we are talking with the designers about how to do this specifically, kind of the road to let players grow inside the game. From the casual to the ranked and onto the pro league, you will be able to design a world to learn and master it again step by step instead of receiving everything in one shot. Yes, it’s a discussion with designers. It’s not planned in terms of features, etcetera, and still we are in the kind of design process, but it’s in our questions today. We are talking a lot about it.
XM: To be honest, the destruction is the same as at E3, but it’s graphically different, but in terms of potential to create more of that, it’s the same amount of technology behind it. Graphically, it’s different, because we did it on a PC version when we first showed it at E3, and because of all of the optimisation after and trying to be at 60 frames per second [on consoles, assumedly], because that point was absolutely important. It was forbidden to run below 60 frames per second. Absolutely not. If you want to be competitive, it has to be at 60.
We re-increased [destructibility] after because we relearnt some new processes to optimise, etcetera. We are on the road to again and again to gain some graphical resources, etcetera, just because we are learning, also, the more you spend time on working, the more you are able to optimise, and the more you have space to increase the rest of the game.
XM: Yes, but no it’s too early. It would be an issue to provide a community test server too early. We need to do everything in the right order. First, technical. The technical server for us to maintain everything, matchmaking, etcetera, to be extremely clean and powerful in our systems. As soon as it’s done, yes, we would like, but it has to be in the right order. So first technical, community maybe after.
Mindfreak waved the Australian flag during the Xbox One portion of the tournament, but were unfortunately knocked out in the quarter finals by US team Lethal Gaming. There was some promise in how Mindfreak played that wasn’t represented in the final score but, after we spoke with captain Jayden “Dizzle” Saunders, he said his team would be heading home with the hopes of shaking up the Australian meta to a more aggressive form.
Unfortunately for Xbox One teams like Mindfreak, Ubisoft has chosen to focus purely on the PC for world championships in year two. This was just one of the topics that we wanted to talk to Remy about during our interview. We also wanted to talk about the evolution of Rainbow Six Siege’s meta, specifically because – unlike other shooters that tend to stay the course – Ubisoft Montreal unashamedly goes out of its way to change the meta with its new operators every quarter.
Tactics that dominate with the player base for part of the year may be undermined by the introduction of an operator who’s purpose-built to counter such tricks. Read on for our interview with Remy.
AM: It’s extremely difficult to say how much the meta is going to be evolving based on the new content. I think the new content, and we’re pushing now in year two, we’re sort of, I believe, getting a little better about our operators, I think, in the sense that now we have so much data, so many ways to look at how players can play much better than us, obviously, play the current game. We know there are weaknesses and areas of improvement for the meta. One of the examples that we’re using a lot is how Thermite, the whole first year was an automatic pick. There was no attacking team without him, and the idea we started introducing Hibana, which starts to be an option, like, a true choice.
AM: That’s funny because it’s a little bit of an intention and something that happens out of necessity. The moment you drop two new operators every three months, the meta is going to be different, the meta is going to be shaken, even, by a high margin, so the only way you would say, ‘Let’s not shake the meta that much,’ would be to say, ‘Let’s not introduce any new operators,’ and we absolutely feel that this content is necessary for several reasons. This is what keeps the game cool, fresh, more meaningful, and I think we have 10 more years at least of new operators to come, from the drawings like this [points to our A5 notebook] from Xavier [Marquis], and at least two [A5 notebooks] like this filled with operators, so I’m super confident of how much we can further push the number of operators.
And to be very, very honest, a lot of us are super fans of those community multiplayer games that you tend to play for long periods of time. And as a player, I want to be surprised. I want to be shaken from my habits and my customs. I do play Dota a lot, for instance, and for me, each time there’s a major and a compendium, that’s like Christmas. And I think that’s super important to keep the content, the meta surprising, changing, so clearly we have more and more intention every season it’s going to shake up the meta with mid-season Reinforcements, we are rebalancing the meta as much as possible, and every trimester, yes, it’s going to change.
AM: That’s funny because that’s exactly one of the discussions we’re having in the room downstairs. I’m extremely surprised and excited, especially when I do compare to season one, by how the games are now more and more tied. We often go into overtime. We often go extra rounds, meaning that the games and the teams have grown a lot in experience.
Season one, you saw, like, matches that came 5-0 and it was not even fun to watch, and I’m guessing not fun to play either for the losing team. So I think the game as it grows and as the players especially are starting to become more and more experts about it, discovering new tactics and such, we are seeing much closer rounds and matches and that’s, to me, the biggest evolution that we’ve seen.
AM: There’s, for us, a before and after BattlEye, and not just on PC, let’s be extremely clear on that. That’s crazy. The switch of feeling and sentiment that it gave to the whole community, like Xbox and PS4 players, while they were not at all impacted by cheating, or very little, it almost does not exist. They were re-joining by the fact that there was an anti-cheat. I think they were happy obviously for the PC players as a whole, it was a good move but, also, I feel that the message to them that they received is, okay, the developers at Ubisoft do care.
If there’s something that is harming the game, that we will at least try and try their best to fix it. So I think that BattlEye, even though it was only for PC, not only did it totally clean the PC format and the PC platform, it was a super good message obviously for the competitive scene, but overall, for the whole base of players, it was a super positive message. They do care, they do want to do what’s best for the game, and there was a sort of good moment, I think, and a shifting moment where people started to give us more trust about, okay, those guys are serious about keeping that game.
AM: What we are deciding for year two when it comes to the overall eSports pro scene is two main big decisions. One of the decisions is to put a high focus on one of the platforms, and the decision has been made to put PC as the lead platform. That being said, the other good news or the other news or the key point for next year is the introduction of major league for both PlayStation and Xbox. So we are keeping an entry point to the competition for every format and every platform. Year two, by putting the lead on one platform, it’s going to create stability, and because we’re giving away one full year of visibility, one high focus on one platform, so there are more teams that we can enter with our investment and efforts that those guys have a sustainable year of competition ahead.
It’s part of the… as you can imagine, it’s almost a two-step decision that happened. The first step was, we are going to be concentrating on one platform. And I think everyone around the table that was involved in the discussion and decision was, like, “This is almost a no-brainer. Yeah, focusing on one platform is what we should be doing, no doubt.” Then, obviously, the most difficult in the decision-making was, “Okay, which platform shall we focus on?” and we re-evaluated everything, I mean, “Why not even PlayStation ?” after all. So we looked at it, and some of the factors, including what you’re mentioning, the viewership. It doesn’t mean that Xbox viewers are not important at all, but I think there’s a little or even a big majority of watchers who are more of a PC background at least on Rainbow Six. And the last aspect of that viewership that’s more qualitative and it’s super interesting, and we sort of had to make the decision as well is while Xbox players and watchers do watch Xbox streams and PC streams, the opposite is not true.
So, alright, we do have a larger PC viewership audience that is sticking to one sort of format or one scene and not watching the other. It’s showing a sustainable and potential… like, the growth was interesting for us, developers, PC is the lead platform for development, and so this is what we’ve been doing for the first year is the whole game is first and foremost developed and balanced on PC, and, obviously, we’re deploying everywhere at the parity level. But we’ve had the pro teams, Continuum for instance, come in the studio two, three times every season to try the content, give feedback, help us balance overall, so we do have constant workshops and discussions, and we can do this on PC, but not at all on console. We can’t have them test easily online or somewhere else the build on any of the consoles. So PC for us on the development side of things is easier.
There’s almost two aspects on your question. One aspect is how we take a dedicated bunch of players and help them go through the different steps if they have the will to become potentially pro or semi-pro. I think the PC structure for next year that has a community or grass-roots level of competition, almost anyone can join, it’s easy, etcetera. Then there’s a challenger league that is one step beyond with the bigger prize money, and a limited number of teams, now you start having a responsibility as a team and as a player to show up for matches, be on time. There’s a whole process of growing you as a potential athlete. And then, obviously, the pro league which is the top of the thing. So we are starting to structure the thing with more layers to help more people getting in and potentially getting to the top. That being said, even in the wildest dreams you can have, you would never have even the grass roots competition that are happening on the weekend and the tournaments, you’ll never have one million players getting in.
It takes a certain dedication, mindset, they are competitive people that are willing to sacrifice, do tournaments, take their computers and go to a LAN, for instance, and some that are not in that vein. I do play soccer with my friends once in a while, I’m not practicing soccer in a club with matches and training and practice, so there is already, I think, in the players there’s a natural selection or difference, should I say. To me, back to your sort of question of how or the larger question, to how we on-board people to get better in the game, regardless of most of the competition, this is a clinical question. And how we attract more players knowing that the game is deeper, richer, so sometimes it’s almost more complex for newcomers, and that’s clearly a challenge for newcomers we face next year and we’ll have to find solutions, and we have the discussions. I think we have interesting avenues that we can go. We haven’t made any decisions at the moment, but this is very likely to be the biggest challenge we will face moving forward.
AM: This is pretty much going to be over and across the whole year, starting with the 5.2 [patch] which is season one Reinforcement, mid-season Reinforcement, sorry, the mid-season. One of the aspects in the tech road map that we’re putting this year is we are pushing the tech features on the mid-season and not at the beginning of the season with the content.
That will help us and that’s going to make it cleaner overall for everyone. So the roadmap of migrating to all the second line services from peer-to-peer to pure client-server starting mid-season one and that’s going to go over the whole year, service by service.
AM: Most of them, the top three, it’s regarding overall what we’ve called health, so hit registration, matchmaking stability, connection overall. So something that they’re obviously because they’re playing so many hours, that would expose much more often I would say than someone who just plays an hour, so that’s the main, main aspect for them.
Then when it comes to content or ideas, usually the number one discussion we’re having is about the state of the meta and what’s not balanced enough, so that’s tonnes of discussion about the operators, about the guns, about every of the values on every of the aspects of the game, so that’s a lot of the iterative process, and now we’re starting seeing, it’s more recent as a request, it’s those players saying, “Hey, I’m now at the top of the ranking system in Rainbow Six, I’ve reached the endgame, can we have like, a ladder, a leaderboard, or another extra step and keep on having that… and keep on doing and grinding and getting a lot?” So that’s something we’re looking at, yes.
AM:: So we are equipped and there’s a whole department at Ubisoft Montreal that’s a user research lab whose sole purpose is to look at all the data that the game is generating on every of our user. We know the operator they pick, the weapon, the win/lose, when they die, how they died.
We generate heatmaps on every level of every game if we can. And this is that huge big data that we’re having on the game that we are looking and the research lab is looking and creating reports and bringing questions, issues, etcetera. So when it comes to balancing the meta, it’s not, “Oh, we think that.” It’s not, “Hey, someone told me this.” It’s pure cold data that you look at—the win rate, the pick rate, all of those aspects—and this is how you balance. Most of the time, in order to be sharper in our balancing, we look at the top of the players on PC, to be honest, so that particular population that we are looking at more closely to readjust our balancing overall, especially on weapons and operators, and from there we deploy to everyone, then we monitor all of the platforms, casual, if the choices we make looking at that sort of one percent if you will applies well and is not creating this balance.
AM: Thank you. So you play?
AM: What would you like to see changed?
AM:: It’s tough, this one. Maybe we should go see the research lab and ask them about exactly that. If there is any sort of learnings we can get, because there are purely opinions on pros and cons, but when I say, yeah, it’s super cool because certain defenders roam and change the state of the match by roaming outside, taking a high risk, and it’s a high reward, but at some point at some times, it happens to be, like, ‘Guys, come on!’ Especially at the point where it’s almost spawn killing.
Microsoft's slimmer, 4K console is now available.View details
PlayStation 4 Pro comes with 1TB of storage and a wireless controller.View details
Purchase the Nintendo Switch with grey Joy-Cons or Neon Blue and Red Joy-Cons from eBay today.View details
This nifty Nintendo Switch accessory provides twice the stability and double the on-the-go gaming. Read more…
Lara's latest adventure showcases a new level of action-packed Croft-manship. Read more…
Overcooked 2 is a thoroughly delicious second course that serves up some of the best single-screen multiplayer in modern gaming. Read more…
Learn how two gamers took it upon themselves to hide bitcoin on planets. Read more…
Samsung users can access the Beta starting today with more Android devices receiving support later in the week. Read more…
We've rounded up every Australian retailer's price on the Switch.
Boost your online gaming performance with WTFast's free 14-day trial.
Protect your laptop, PC & mobile from viruses with Norton for $89.99.
finder.com.au is one of Australia's leading comparison websites. We compare from a wide set of major banks, insurers and product issuers.
finder.com.au has access to track details from the product issuers listed on our sites. Although we provide information on the products offered by a wide range of issuers, we don't cover every available product. You should consider whether the products featured on our site are appropriate for your needs and seek independent advice if you have any questions.
Products marked as 'Promoted' or "Advertisement" are prominently displayed either as a result of a commercial advertising arrangement or to highlight a particular product, provider or feature. Finder may receive remuneration from the Provider if you click on the related link, purchase or enquire about the product. Finder's decision to show a 'promoted' product is neither a recommendation that the product is appropriate for you nor an indication that the product is the best in its category. We encourage you to use the tools and information we provide to compare your options and find the best option for you.
The identification of a group of products, as 'Top' or 'Best' is a reflection of user preferences based on current website data. On a regular basis, analytics drive the creation of a list of popular products. Where these products are grouped, they appear in no particular order.
Where our site links to particular products or displays 'Go to site' buttons, we may receive a commission, referral fee or payment.
We try to take an open and transparent approach and provide a broad based comparison service. However, you should be aware that while we are an independently owned service, our comparison service does not include all providers or all products available in the market.
Some product issuers may provide products or offer services through multiple brands, associated companies or different labelling arrangements. This can make it difficult for consumers to compare alternatives or identify the companies behind the products. However, we aim to provide information to enable consumers to understand these issues.
Providing or obtaining an estimated insurance quote through us does not guarantee you can get the insurance. Acceptance by insurance companies is based on things like occupation, health and lifestyle. By providing you with the ability to apply for a credit card or loan we are not guaranteeing that your application will be approved. Your application for credit products is subject to the Provider's terms and conditions as well as their application and lending criteria.