Nokia 3.1 review: Plans | Pricing | Specs

Name: Nokia 3.1
Brand: Nokia

Alex Kidman

Last updated: Apr 8, 2019

The Nokia 3.1 upgrades the design of the earlier Nokia 3, but the end result is lacking in performance and battery power.

Android One
Nice physical design

Poor camera
Mediocre performance
Middling battery life

5.2 inches

Display size

16GB

Internal storage

13 MP

Rear camera

2,990 mAh

Battery size

Finder rated as Average vs similar phones

We’re reader-supported and may be paid when you visit links to partner sites. We don’t compare all products in the market, but we’re working on it!

Display

Display Size

5.2 inches

Pixels per inch (PPI)

310 ppi

Camera

Rear camera megapixels

13MP

Rear camera aperture size

f/2.0

Video recording

1080p

Front camera megapixels

8MP

Front camera aperture size

f/2.0

Physical Dimensions

Dimensions

146.3mm x 68.7mm x 8.7mm

Weight

138.3g

Connectivity

NFC

Yes

Wi-Fi

802.11 a/b/g/n

Network category speed

Category 4

Power, storage and battery

Processor

Mediatek MT6750

RAM

2GB

Operating system

Android 8

Internal storage

16GB

External storage support

Up to 16GB

Battery capacity

2,990mAh

Device features

Headphone jack

Yes

Fingerprint sensor

Water resistance rating

N/A

Wireless charging

Launch price (RRP)	$249
Launch date	2018-05

Go to Nokia's site More info

Alex Kidman

twitter facebook

A multi-award winning journalist, Alex has written about consumer technology for over 20 years. He has written and edited for virtually every Australian tech publication including Gizmodo, CNET, PC Magazine, Kotaku and more. He has also been the Editor of Gizmodo Australia, PC Mag Australia, CNET.com.au and the Tech and Telco section at Finder. Alex has a Bachelor of Arts from the University of New England and a serious passion for retro gaming.

Where to buy

What's in this review?

Design
Camera
Performance
Battery life
Verdict
Pricing and availability
Alternatives
Specifications

Design

Modern, classic style
18:9 display
Old microUSB charging

Where the Nokia 3's design essentially just got on with being a phone without being particularly notable, the Nokia 3.1 has a more refined approach to its looks, although that's largely due to the fact that it has shifted from a 16:9 display through to an 18:9 one, in line with 2018's most prevailing smartphone trend. It's not even a unique feature for the budget space, with makes brands such as Alcatel already having staked a claim in the 18:9 space.
Still, the design of the Nokia 3.1 is a nice one, with its 146.3 x 68.7 x 8.7 mm size and 138.3g weight giving it a light feel in the hand.
The Nokia 3.1 has an unfussy look in the black as tested, which will suit the style of those who just want a phone to get on with providing information. Nokia does produce more "showy" phones, but this isn't the Nokia 3.1's strong suit. Again, we're seeing more budget phones with designs that go beyond the basic plastic of recent years, but Nokia's designers have done decent work here at the Nokia 3.1's price point.
One feature you won't find on the Nokia 3.1 that we are seeing in phones at this price point is any kind of fingerprint sensor for quick unlocking. If you want to secure your Nokia 3.1 – and you should – you'll have to make do with either a PIN or passcode instead.
Lack of fingerprint sensor aside, the Nokia 3.1's controls are all where you'd expect them to be. Annoyingly, it's still using the older microUSB charging standard rather than the easier USB C that's starting to creep down into the budget sector.

Camera

Average camera, even by budget standards
Slow performance
Loss of detail in low light

Nokia's premium and mid-range cameras trade on its tie-up with Zeiss, but it's yet to bring those premium lenses down into the budget sector. The Nokia 3.1 gets a specification bump over the regular Nokia 3, bringing the single rear sensor up to 13MP, while the front sensor is an 8MP shooter. However, megapixel counts aren't everything, and the Nokia 3.1's camera is ultimately a little disappointing, even for a budget camera phone.
In reasonable light with enough patience you can get decent shots out of the Nokia 3.1, but you're really going to have to work for it. It's a slow camera to start and a slow camera to focus as well.
As you might also expect, the difference when you start losing light is massive, with large levels of loss of detail. As an example, here's a fountain near me in daylight:
That's a passable but not great shot, and it took the Nokia 3.1 some time to decide how it was going to balance the shot. However, wait a few hours for the sun to start going down and it's a very different story:
Obviously with cameras being a key component of smartphone pricing, expecting a great camera is nonsense, but still, even within the budget space the Nokia 3.1 disappoints.

Performance

Processor upgraded to Mediatek MT6750
Android One an improvement
Overall poor performance in class

The Nokia 3 was a sluggish device last year, so my hopes were up when Nokia announced the Nokia 3.1, simply because it features a better class of processor. Specifically, it's jumped from the quad-core Mediatek MT6737 to the octa-core Mediatek MT6750. Sure, that's not a top-class processor, but an improvement was sorely needed over the Nokia 3.
The Nokia 3.1 also has the advantage of being an Android One phone, in line with most of the rest of Nokia's 2018 output. Android One devices offer clean Google interfaces with limited clutter and the promise of at least two year's worth of software upgrades, making them (in effect) mini-Pixel phones. Less bloatware should also equate to a nippier budget phone, right?
Technically, that is what you get, but Nokia's decision to build to a budget, and specifically to limit the model we're getting locally to the 16GB ROM/2GB RAM variant seriously affects the Nokia 3.1's overall performance.
In benchmark terms, it does manage to outclass last year's Nokia 3, but not in a way that compares all that well against its budget brethren. Here's how it compares using Geekbench 4's CPU test:
It's a less compelling story for graphics, where the Nokia 3.1 rendered the second worst benchmark scores we've seen, only besting the much cheaper Nokia 1:
Benchmarks can give you a comparative impression, but they're not the whole story of a phone's performance. I had hoped that the Nokia 3.1 might punch above its benchmark weight in day-to-day performance, but it simply isn't the case. If you're only running a single app it's fine for its budget space. As soon as you've got any kind of multi-tasking running, even if it's as simple as having music playing in a background app while you browse the web, the RAM limit bites in hard, and you're left waiting, often for seconds at a time. Sure, budget phones are never going to be super-fast, but the Nokia 3.1 is just notably slow.

Battery life

Poor battery performance

We've seen plenty of budget phones with exceptional battery life of late. Typically that's been because while they may feature slower processors, that also means that they're not pushing their batteries all that hard, which can be a nice bonus.
Sadly it's not a bonus you'll see with the Nokia 3.1. Its 2990mAh battery capacity should give it some real room to run, but instead, just as it does with app performance, it instead opts to crawl.
Using Geekbench 4's battery test, we recorded a low overall battery score for the Nokia 3.1, indicating it wasn't working that hard, but also a low battery exhaustion time. The lowest we've tested to date, in fact, and that does include the bargain basement Nokia 1. Here's how it compared:
As always, Geekbench 4's battery test is linear, and your usage isn't likely to reflect that. It's certainly feasible to get a single day's battery life out of the Nokia 3.1, but only if you're only using it in a moderate fashion.

Verdict

Clear improvement over Nokia 3, but otherwise not worth it

In a strict family sense, the Nokia 3.1 is a clear improvement over last year's Nokia 3. The design is considerably more pleasant to use, the processor is better and the inclusion of Android One shifts Nokia's "promise" of upgrades for the Nokia 3 into much more feasible territory. There aren't too many Android One phones easily available to Australians right now, and on that basis it does have some value.

However, it's let down badly by its overall performance in the real world, as well as its camera and battery performance. Even within the budget space it's a lesser phone, and only really worth considering if you're a die-hard Nokia fan on a tight budget.

What the other reviewers say

Site	Comment	Score
Expert Reviews	"The Nokia 3 has had an upgrade with the Nokia 3.1, but it's still lacking in certain features."	3/5
Android Central	"Nokia nails the core hardware and features, but comes up short in specs and performance."	3.5/5
GSM Arena	"The Nokia 3.1 surprises with a solid build and compact design, something the old-school Nokia fans would appreciate."	2.4/5

Pricing and availability

Price: RRP $249
Where to buy: Bing Lee | Amazon | Target

Alternatives

The good news is that there's plenty of competition in the budget space, including phones such as the Motorola Moto G6 Play or Motorola Moto E5, Huawei's Nova 3e or Alcatel's range of lower-cost phones.

Huawei Nova 3e

Premium style on a mid-range budget

A slick and sleek design gives the Huawei Nova 3e all the glamour of a high-end smartphone without the steep price tag.

Great design
Headphone jack
Fast charging

Buy at eBay

Specifications

Display

Display Size

5.2 inches

Pixels per inch (PPI)

310 ppi

Camera

Rear camera megapixels

13MP

Rear camera aperture size

f/2.0

Video recording

1080p

Front camera megapixels

8MP

Front camera aperture size

f/2.0

Physical Dimensions

Dimensions

146.3mm x 68.7mm x 8.7mm

Weight

138.3g

Connectivity

NFC

Yes

Wi-Fi

802.11 a/b/g/n

Network category speed

Category 4

Power, storage and battery

Processor

Mediatek MT6750

RAM

2GB

Operating system

Android 8

Internal storage

16GB

External storage support

Up to 16GB

Battery capacity

2,990mAh

Device features

Headphone jack

Yes

Fingerprint sensor

Water resistance rating

N/A

Wireless charging

Latest mobile headlines

Ask an expert

To ask a question simply log in via your email or create an account.

Click here to cancel reply.

Display Name

Your Email (will not be published)

Your Question

Subscribe me to Finder’s free weekly newsletter for budgeting tools, timely news and savings essentials to take control of your finances

Finder only provides general advice and factual information, so consider your own circumstances, or seek advice before you decide to act on our content. By submitting a question, you're accepting our Terms of Use, Disclaimer & Privacy Policy and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

Ask a question

Find a better energy deal right now.

Find our monthly picks of the best mobile plans.

Find the best NBN plan for your needs

Check out the 10 top budget phones you can buy right now

Already on the NBN? We've broken down the best providers.

Discover your next favourite show

Smartphones

Best Phones

Mobile Phone Brands

Guides

Nokia 3.1 review: Plans | Pricing | Specs