Finder makes money from featured partners, but editorial opinions are our own.

Negative gearing claims labelled a “scare campaign”


house and handsA survey claims nearly 80% of investors would abandon the market under negative gearing changes, but one commentator has rubbished the claims.

A real estate group’s survey has claimed 79% of property investors would pull out of the market if changes to negative gearing were introduced.

According to The Australian Financial Review, the Real Estate Institute of Queensland’s survey of more than 14,000 of its members indicated 79% would pull out of property investment if Labor’s negative gearing changes were enacted.

“That will have a crippling effect on house values and on the rental market, where the private rental market plays such a critical role in keeping rents affordable,” REIQ chairman Rob Honeycombe told the AFR.

Honeycomb said this would represent a loss of around $130 billion in value.

But Macrobusiness’ Leith van Onselen has rubbished the claims, calling them a “scare campaign” and saying the group had “abandoned common sense”.

“First, why would housing investors rush for the exits when Labor’s negative gearing policy grandfathers negative gearing for existing investors and would only affect new investors in existing dwellings from 1 July 2017? Surely the vast majority of investors would remain in the housing market and retain their negative gearing benefits, especially if rents were to also rise, as argued by the REIQ, which would make their investments even more profitable?” van Onselen wrote.

Van Onselen said the $130 billion figure quoted by Honeycombe represented a price fall of only 2.2%. He argued that Labor’s policy would channel negative gearing toward new building, bringing new housing supply onto the market rather than diminishing supply.

“And this extra supply would lower rents, other things equal,” van Onselen said.

The stoush is the latest in a number of public debates over negative gearing in the wake of the government’s pledge it would not change the concession in its upcoming budget.

Get more from Finder

Ask an Expert

You are about to post a question on

  • Do not enter personal information (eg. surname, phone number, bank details) as your question will be made public
  • is a financial comparison and information service, not a bank or product provider
  • We cannot provide you with personal advice or recommendations
  • Your answer might already be waiting – check previous questions below to see if yours has already been asked

Finder only provides general advice and factual information, so consider your own circumstances, or seek advice before you decide to act on our content. By submitting a question, you're accepting our Terms of Use, Disclaimer & Privacy Policy and 6. Finder Group Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Go to site