Women are 40% more likely than men to be facing cost-of-living induced financial stress.
Women's savings buffer dropped from 15 to 13 weeks in the last 2 years.
59% of women say they are enjoying life less compared to 12 months ago due to financial pressure, compared to only 48% of men.
Savings and earnings are still less
Earnings
Australian women experience a 21.7% gender pay gap. For every dollar a man earns, a woman receives just 78 cents. This means women make $26,393 less than men on average. The Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA) 2023 gender pay gap data covers base salary, overtime, bonuses, and other financial remuneration for full-time, casual, and part-time workers.
Even when only the base salary is considered, women still earn $13,183 less than men and have to work 56 days more every year to earn the same amount as a man.
The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) reported a lower pay gap of 12% based on mean weekly cash earnings (AWE) in November 2023. This is the lowest difference on record. Unlike WGEA, ABS data only includes full-time employees their base pay.
Commonly cited gender pay gap measure
Commonly cited gender pay gap measure
Gender pay gap measures
Commonly cited measure (AWE)(a) (%)
May-14
18.3
Nov-14
18.6
May-15
17.9
Nov-15
17.2
May-16
16.2
Nov-16
16
May-17
15.3
Nov-17
15.3
May-18
14.5
Nov-18
14.1
May-19
14
Nov-19
13.9
May-20
14
Nov-20
13.4
May-21
14.2
Nov-21
13.8
May-22
14.1
Nov-22
13.3
May-23
13
Nov-23
12
Data from the ABS also highlights the differences between public (government) and private sector pay. There's a smaller gap in the public sector (11.5%) compared to the private sector (17.2%). This is likely due to the prevalence of award pay in the public sector which is closely regulated and provides more transparency for employees.
Expert insight
"Data from Finder's insightful report highlights the pressing need to address the economic and financial disparities faced by Australian women. Burden of caregiving responsibilities, unaffordable childcare, and entrenched gender stereotypes contribute to a staggering gender pay gap, costing our economy $51.8 billion annually. We must invest in women by ensuring equal access to opportunities for skills development, entrepreneurship, and career advancement, as well as promoting women's representation in leadership positions across all industries, as vital steps towards a truly inclusive, diverse, and equitable society."
Simone Clarke
CEO, UN Women Australia
Average weekly cash earnings by sector
Sector
Men
Women
Pay gap
Public
2183.30
1956.80
11.6
Private
1946.90
1658.30
17.4
The pay gap also differs across regions and industries. Tasmania recorded the lowest gender pay gap (5.7%) while Western Australia has the highest (27.7%). Industries such as education and training (9%) and healthcare and social assistance (26%) experience gaps, while the pay difference is worst in professional, scientific and technical services (31%).
Average gender gap in full-time adult weekly earnings by industry
Average gender gap in full-time adult weekly earnings by industry
Industry
Pay gap
Mining
18.7
Manufacturing
14.5
Electricity, gas, water & waste services
12
Construction
7.3
Wholesale trade
14.5
Retail trade
11.7
Accommodation & food services
10.6
Transport, postal & warehousing
8.2
Information media & telecommunications
19.2
Financial & insurance services
21.2
Rental, hiring & real estate services
17.3
Professional, scientific & technical services
30.7
Administrative & support services
21.3
Public administration & safety
5.5
Education & training
9.4
Health care & social assistance
26
Arts & recreation services
18.4
Other services
8.1
Total all industries
13.6
These lower earnings affect many financial and non-financial related outcomes for women, most of all though, they result in lower savings.
I'm a big believer that knowledge is power and on that front, women are in the front seat: among Aussies 15 to 74 years old, more women (35.2%) hold a bachelor's degree than men (28.8%), and have earned non-school qualification at the same proportion (63%) as men. As OECD data has shown, those with a tertiary education are likely to earn a higher income in the long-run, so this is an encouraging trend.
Men were able to build much larger savings buffers during 2021. Before the full effect of government stimulus (JobKeeper) in May 2020, men saved an extra 30% of what women saved each month. A year later men were saving double what women were saving each month.
Average monthly savings by gender
Average monthly savings by gender
Month
Female
Male
2019-05
540
821
2019-06
549
805
2019-07
561
756
2019-08
548
742
2019-09
528
731
2019-10
556
764
2019-11
583
766
2019-12
592
762
2020-01
544
740
2020-02
507
767
2020-03
503
805
2020-04
533
829
2020-05
626
818
2020-06
667
815
2020-07
679
847
2020-08
649
869
2020-09
674
831
2020-10
683
903
2020-11
638
980
2020-12
618
1123
2021-01
616
1140
2021-02
698
1143
2021-03
693
1165
2021-04
640
1191
2021-05
591
1190
2021-06
562
1068
2021-07
586
990
2021-08
601
926
2021-09
598
920
2021-10
577
939
2021-11
538
919
2021-12
554
935
2022-01
549
861
2022-02
493
752
2022-03
455
612
2022-04
448
520
2022-05
514
619
2022-06
578
746
2022-07
588
864
2022-08
608
917
2022-09
604
883
2022-10
649
809
2022-11
621
712
2022-12
542
730
2023-01
508
811
2023-02
513
835
2023-03
540
816
2023-04
524
751
2023-05
491
762
2023-06
509
725
2023-07
527
793
2023-08
553
823
2023-09
537
903
2023-10
557
854
2023-11
564
826
2023-12
570
811
2024-01
551
832
This is likely to do with workforce engagement discussed in the earnings section above. Women constitute 68.5% of all part-time employees, often to balance childcare and other domestic activities that typically still fall to women.
To be eligible for the full government stimulus handed out during the pandemic, consumers had to have been working a certain number of hours meaning that those working part-time (30% of women compared to 11% of men) in some cases were eligible for less or completely ineligible for government payments.
The same risk-aversion that makes women great investors, also helps them to save money. Analysis from our 2022 International Women's Day report showed that both overseas and at home here in Australia, women were better at managing their money – spending less in late fees, holding lower balances on their credit cards and saving a greater percentage of their income. Unfortunately in the last 18 months, cost of living pressures have impacted women more than men, and the gender pay gap means women are starting from a lower financial base.
In good news, the pink tax on some products has dropped. A report by the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs in 2015 found that women paid an average of 13% more for hair products, razors, deodorant and moisturiser products that were specifically marketed as being "for women". Finder found this disparity to still be the case in Australian supermarkets as recently as 2022. However, Finder's analysis of razors and deodorant prices in 2024 reveals parity between male and female products – a promising development.
Cost of living crisis has hit women harder
Cost of living pressures have affected more women and have had a larger impact on their finances than men. Two-thirds of women (69%) admit they have been experiencing financial stress, compared to just 49% of men. This is equivalent to 7.1 million Australian women facing financial stress.
Cost of living pressures have eroded women's savings. In January 2022 women had 15 weeks' worth of savings buffers. This has dropped to 12.8 weeks as we come into 2024. Meanwhile, men's savings buffers have increased from 17.9 weeks two years ago to 18.3 now.
Average length of time (in weeks) that Australians could live off their savings with no income
Average length of time (in weeks) that Australians could live off their savings with no income
Month
Female
Male
Jan 2022
15
17.9
Feb 2022
14.6
17.4
Mar 2022
13.9
16.8
Apr 2022
13.7
15.5
May 2022
13.7
16.3
Jun 2022
13.8
16.7
Jul 2022
13.3
17
Aug 2022
14.3
18
Sep 2022
13.6
19.5
Oct 2022
13.6
20.2
Nov 2022
12.3
18.4
Dec 2022
13
16.1
Jan 2023
12.8
16.2
Feb 2023
12.4
17
Mar 2023
11.7
17.7
Apr 2023
11.9
17.2
May 2023
11.7
17.3
Jun 2023
11.9
16.8
Jul 2023
11.5
17.1
Aug 2023
11.9
17.7
Sep 2023
11.6
19.8
Oct 2023
12.2
20.4
Nov 2023
12.6
19.7
Dec 2023
13
18.4
Jan 2024
12.8
18.3
As a result, many women are struggling to pay their bills. Housing expenses are causing women particular strain. Over 2 in 5 (42%) female homeowners were having difficulty paying their mortgage in January 2024. This is up from 22% at the beginning of 2022. The proportion of men struggling to pay their home loan rose from 27% to 32% over the same period.
The same is true among renters. The number of male tenants struggling to pay rent has risen by 3% (from 37% to 40%) in the last two years compared to 8% (from 40% to 48%) for female tenants.
Proportion of consumers who struggle to pay their rent by gender
Proportion of consumers who struggle to pay their rent by gender
Month - For Trends
Male
Female
May-19
29
31
Jun-19
29
33
Jul-19
29
34
Aug-19
29
36
Sep-19
30
36
Oct-19
29
34
Nov-19
30
35
Dec-19
30
36
Jan-20
32
35
Feb-20
31
33
Mar-20
30
33
Apr-20
31
35
May-20
34
36
Jun-20
32
34
Jul-20
28
32
Aug-20
23
29
Sep-20
21
29
Oct-20
23
28
Nov-20
25
31
Dec-20
26
31
Jan-21
25
32
Feb-21
24
29
Mar-21
25
29
Apr-21
27
30
May-21
30
32
Jun-21
31
34
Jul-21
31
34
Aug-21
31
34
Sep-21
30
36
Oct-21
30
35
Nov-21
33
38
Dec-21
35
37
Jan-22
37
40
Feb-22
36
39
Mar-22
35
40
Apr-22
38
42
May-22
38
43
Jun-22
36
43
Jul-22
35
42
Aug-22
37
43
Sep-22
37
41
Oct-22
36
40
Nov-22
34
42
Dec-22
37
46
Jan-23
36
47
Feb-23
38
48
Mar-23
38
47
Apr-23
41
47
May-23
40
51
Jun-23
43
54
Jul-23
42
56
Aug-23
42
55
Sep-23
38
55
Oct-23
36
53
Nov-23
36
50
Dec-23
39
48
Jan-24
40
48
The emotional effect of the cost of living
The outsized impact of cost of living pressures on women's finances is not only increasing financial stress, it is also affecting fulfilment and happiness.
More than half (59%) of women say they enjoy life less than they did 12 months ago due to financial pressure, compared to only 48% of men.
Cost of living setbacks: Growing wealth
Superannuation
Australian Taxation Office (ATO) data indicates that at the end of June 2021 men had 20.5% more in superannuation than women.
It should be noted that this gap fluctuates with age. For Australians in their 20's the gap is 11%. When adding the time many women have to spend out of work to birth and raise children, this steadily increases up until the age of 50, ballooning to a disparity of 36%.
Average superannuation balance by age and gender
Label
Men
Women
Difference
18-24
8,148
7,328
11%
25-29
25,981
23,429
11%
30-34
56,344
46,289
22%
35-39
95,937
75,785
27%
40-44
139,431
107,538
30%
45-49
190,716
142,037
34%
50-54
246,955
182,167
36%
55-59
316,457
236,530
34%
60-64
402,838
318,203
27%
65-69
453,075
403,038
12%
70-74
509,059
451,523
13%
75 or more
507,556
436,865
16%
To make up for this discrepancy, the average woman would have to supplement an extra $131 per month into her super, or alternatively, work a further 5 years.
Gladly, this figure has almost halved since 2022 when women needed to supplement their super by an extra $236 per month or work an added 11 years.
Worryingly, less than half of women (41%) believe they will have enough superannuation to get by in retirement compared to almost 2 in 3 (59%) of men.
Flexibility in work arrangements, such as working from home, help to encourage a range of people to participate in the workforce, especially women. For instance: the Melbourne Institute highlights that giving women at least one day's worth of WFH per week, can help reduce the unpaid work hours they contribute. Making childcare more accessible and affordable also has the potential to help improve women's career advancement opportunities.
Women may receive less financial help from their parents
Finder's recent Parenting Report 2023 which surveyed 1000 parents with children under the age of 12, found that parents plan to gift their sons 24% more to buy a home. Daughters can expect to receive an average of $29,349 towards a place in the property market while boys get $36,529.
Negativity about the ability to afford a property
The inter-generational challenges of buying property have been well-documented, however, breaking this data down by gender further exacerbates the divide.
How many years it'll take to afford a property
Concerns about affordability are entirely valid. Based on median house and unit prices today, the average full-time female worker would need to work an extra 3 years to save enough for a 20% deposit on a house or a unit.
Years required to save for a house deposit by gender
Years required to save for a house deposit by gender
Years to save for a house
Males
Females
WA
9
13
NT
10
13
SA
12
14
TAS
12
14
QLD
13
17
VIC
14
18
ACT
14
17
Australia
15
18
NSW
21
25
Years required to save for a unit deposit by gender
Years required to save for a unit deposit by gender
Years to save for unit
Males
Females
WA
6
9
NT
7
9
QLD
9
12
ACT
9
10
SA
9
10
VIC
10
13
TAS
11
12
Australia
11
14
NSW
14
17
Servicing a mortgage
Mortgage stress is defined as a consumer spending more than 30% of their income on home loan repayments. Analysis on the minimum income required to service a mortgage on the median house price in each suburb across NSW, QLD and VIC without falling into mortgage stress found that men have a much larger pool of suburbs to choose from.
A single woman in Victoria with an average annual income of around $87,552 can afford a unit in half the suburbs that a man earning an average income of $100,542 can. Single men can access units in 80% more suburbs in New South Wales and 45% more in Queensland. These splits are also similar for houses.
This is a prime example of how a pay gap of 13% to 21% can become much larger in other financial areas.
Investing
More than 1 in 3 (36%) males have a share trading account compared to only 1 in 6 (17%) females. This divide in ownership continues in the amount each gender has invested. Male investors have $88,775 invested in the shares – almost double the $45,125 women have invested.
Men have also seen their balance invested grow a lot faster than women over the past 2 years. Women's balances have only increased by 3% since January 2022 while men's balances have increased by 88%.
Average share investment balance by gender
Average share investment balance by gender
Month
Male
Female
Sep 2021
56842.81481
43314.68462
Oct 2021
52874.80157
37673.8971
Nov 2021
48767.79679
34613.19238
Dec 2021
44669.01259
37468.53392
Jan 2022
47177.37482
43791.95817
Feb 2022
57030.58677
50661.09542
Mar 2022
64292.89006
38578.41017
Apr 2022
77756.24545
29764.75373
May 2022
75762.92548
27940.83817
Jun 2022
73161.30829
43070.81866
Jul 2022
67865.31146
45848.16307
Aug 2022
78810.66465
47742.89686
Sep 2022
86134.20035
37904.29532
Oct 2022
83716.44868
37073.66477
Nov 2022
74117.80306
30193.97745
Dec 2022
62287.18564
45004.42746
Jan 2023
61422.66477
52271.67946
Feb 2023
67824.33747
57543.90032
Mar 2023
74226.21733
52906.65192
Apr 2023
85367.30252
48810.64735
May 2023
87884.70516
49911.49564
Jun 2023
91469.97829
47505.73033
Jul 2023
87119.35236
50159.56155
Aug 2023
81644.93292
46815.76733
Sep 2023
85630.80832
42392.13169
Oct 2023
89422.16539
40686.98498
Nov 2023
91729.39555
45243.00631
Dec 2023
93908.4817
44167.81342
Jan 2024
88775.45119
45124.95111
This is unlikely to be due to better investment decisions. Research conducted in both the US and Australia shows women tend to outperform men at investing.
Analysis by FinClear on more than 550,000 wealthy Australian traders revealed that women outperformed men in high-conviction strategies by 7.5 percentage points during the 22-23 financial year. Women returned an average 8.2% compared to 0.73% for men.
This difference has been captured in many other studies too, even as early as 2001 when Berkeley research found that men made almost 1% less than women when investing.
The outsized impact of cost of living pressures on women has likely restricted their ability to invest. This highlights the importance of reaching full equity in pay. This will afford women the same financial security as men and give them the same ability to weather tougher economic periods.
According to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) 2023 Australian Investor Study, half of the net 1.2 million investors who entered the market after 2020 were women. While female investors are still outnumbered (42% to 58%), this is an important move in the right direction.
"Women still routinely earn less than men when performing the exact same roles. They still retire on far less superannuation than men. And in 2024, when the theme for International Women's Day encourages us to 'Count Her In: Invest in Women', we're reminded of the pivotal role we all play in creating opportunities for everyone to thrive.
In my mother's generation, it was the law that when you got married, you had to resign from your job with the public service. The assumption was that you are married now, therefore your household has a "breadwinner" – your husband – so you should no longer be in the workforce, lest you greedily take the place of another breadwinning husband or desperate husband-less woman.
It was only in 1966 that the law was changed, though it took some time to take effect – in Queensland, for instance, the government removed its "marriage bar" in late 1969.
Stories like this can be a reminder of just how far we've come as a society, when it comes to equality and equity in the workplace.
However, reports like this one stand as a call to arms to continue making progress."
"Finder's research raises some vital points about the financial experiences of women, including the toll that the cost of living crisis has taken on them. It shows 20% more women than men are financially stressed – and that women typically have half the savings and a third of the emergency funds men have access to.
Gender pay gaps play a part in this, but beyond that it's also worth thinking about what risks can come from not having enough in the bank. For example, Finder's research shows women take longer than men to pay off their credit card debt and have more of it. But they're also smart when it comes to choosing cards with lower rates, so it may not always be by choice that they carry a higher balance. Especially when expenses like the pill, period products and even medical diagnoses typically cost women more.
These things didn't happen overnight and they won't disappear overnight. But one of the most valuable steps we can take towards equality is to talk about what's different – and how we can change it, together."
Joshua Godfrey is a Senior Insights Analyst at Finder, specialising in data analysis and identifying emerging trends through the Consumer Sentiment Tracker, a monthly survey on Australians' financial attitudes. He has authored Finder’s 2024 Wealth Building Report and 2025 First Home Buyer Report which have been widely quoted in top media outlets like the AFR and news.com.au. With a Bachelor of Business in Finance and Marketing and a Diploma of Creative Intelligence from UTS, Josh is passionate about uncovering patterns in consumer sentiment and exploring how they influence the future of finance.
See full bio
Joshua's expertise
Joshua
has written
42
Finder guides across topics including:
Find a better deal, save on your bills and get a free gift card. Sign up to be the first to hear about new Finder Rewards.
Important information about this website
Finder is a comparison service. We do not compare every product or every provider in the market.
We make money through commercial arrangements with some of the providers on this site. Products marked 'Sponsored', 'Promoted', 'Featured' or 'Advertisement' appear as a result of a commercial arrangement.
Our editorial content, product reviews and any 'Top Pick' designations are prepared independently of these commercial arrangements.
The default order of products in our tables can be influenced by commercial arrangements. You can re-sort or filter using the controls above each table.
Some content on this site may be generated or supported by AI tools. You should verify details directly with the provider.
Finder is one of Australia's leading comparison websites. We are committed to our readers and stand by our editorial principles.
Our comparison service does not include every product or every provider in the market. Some product issuers offer their products under multiple brands or through associated companies. Where we can, we identify the underlying issuer so you can compare like with like, but you should always check with the provider directly to confirm which brand you are dealing with.
Finder is a comparison website and an intermediary. We are not a product issuer and we do not provide personal financial or credit advice. When you click a link to a product, or apply for a product through our site, you deal directly with the product issuer. We may receive a referral fee, commission or other payment from the issuer if you click through, apply or take out a product. We describe these arrangements in more detail under 'How we make money' below.
Product features, fees, terms and eligibility criteria are set by the product issuer and may change. We rely on information supplied by issuers when we present product details on our site. Before you apply for or take out any product, you should confirm the details directly with the issuer.
We earn revenue from Finder in four principal ways:
Referral fees and commissions. When you click a product link, complete an enquiry form or apply for a product through our site, we may receive a referral fee, commission or other payment from the product issuer. We may also receive payment based on the volume of leads or conversions we send to an issuer.
Sponsored placements. Products marked 'Sponsored', 'Promoted', 'Featured' or 'Advertisement' appear as a result of a commercial arrangement between Finder and the issuer. These labels always indicate a paid placement. We do not use them for editorial choices.
Display advertising. Banner advertising, newsletter advertising and similar display ads on our site are paid by advertisers.
Content sponsorship. Some articles, videos and social media posts are sponsored by an issuer and are clearly labelled as such.
Our editorial opinions, product reviews and any 'Top Pick' designations are prepared independently of these commercial arrangements. A 'Top Pick' is an editorial choice made by our writers and editors based on the criteria described on each comparison page. A 'Top Pick' is not a personal recommendation and does not mean the product is appropriate for your circumstances.
If you would like to know whether we have a commercial arrangement with a specific product issuer, please contact us.
When products are grouped in a table or list, the default order can be influenced by commercial arrangements we have with product issuers. In some categories, sponsored or featured products appear in the top positions of the table by default, and are always labelled as such.
Other factors that influence default order include price, fees and features, and (where relevant) our editorial view of the product.
You can re-sort every comparison table using the controls above the table. You can filter by product features that matter to you. The order you see after re-sorting or filtering is not influenced by commercial arrangements.
Some content on this site is generated or supported by artificial intelligence tools, including our AI-powered assistant FinderBot. AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify important information directly with the product issuer before making a financial decision. For more information about FinderBot, see the FinderBot Terms of Use and FinderBot Privacy Collection Notice.
Please read our website terms of use and privacy policy for more information about our services and our approach to privacy.
We update our data regularly, but information can change between updates. Confirm details with the provider you're interested in before making a decision.
Our goal is to create the best possible product, and your thoughts, ideas and suggestions play a major role in helping us identify opportunities to improve.