India mulls total cryptocurrency ban with 10-year jail term for offenders
This stands to be the most severe cryptocurrency ban ever passed.
But it's well on the way, with an inter-ministerial committee now recommending a total ban. The full details of the Banning of Cryptocurrency & Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2019 can be found at India's Department of Economic Affairs website.
It recognises the positive aspects of blockchain on one hand and proposes penalties including up to 10 years imprisonment for cryptocurrency users on the other.
How India's feeling about blockchain
Regarding blockchain, the report generally says that it has some great applications, but there's still a lot of work to be done before it's ready for prime time.
Blockchain is good on the whole
"The Committee believes that DLT is an important new and innovative technology, which will play a major role in ushering in of the digital age," the committee says. "The Committee therefore recommends that the Department of Economic Affairs should identify uses of DLT and take necessary measures to facilitate the use of DLT in the entire financial field."
Blockchain still has technical issues
The technical challenges and risks the report identifies can be summarised as "the usual". They include scalability, interoperability, cybersecurity, governance, key management and privacy.
Identifiable regulatory obstacles
There are also some specific regulatory issues that need to be overcome, including the following:
- The setting and vetting of industry standards.
- A need for clarity about ownership and jurisdictions in public ledgers. Which jurisdiction is a public blockchain in? What it the final point of a transaction? These questions have no answer, but will need one.
- AML/KYC issues.
- A lack of recourse or ability to reverse transactions.
How India's feeling about cryptocurrency
The report acknowledges that there are some practical applications for "official" digital currency such as central bank digital currency and emoney, and it emphasises that its concerns are focused strictly on "unofficial" cryptocurrencies.
These unofficial digital currencies, it says, are almost universally driven by rampant speculation and lacking in inherent value. Even utility tokens with identifiable functions have "negligible" inherent value given the high chance of any given utility token becoming useless as the technology evolves, the report says.
Consumer protection challenges
The consumer protection issues are a nightmare, especially for "unsophisticated" consumers the committee says, due to factors such as the following:
- Outright fraud such as Ponzi schemes
- Hacking losses
- Contentious hard forks and similar situations that might result in loss of value
- Natural and unnatural volatility in the form of price manipulation – even stablecoins will fluctuate, the report points out
Bitcoin consumes a lot of energy, the report points out, although it comes at the issue from the factually incorrect perspective of energy consumption per transaction, and it makes the common mistake of completely ignoring all non-proof-of-work consensus mechanisms and discounting sharding and other scaling techniques.
Risk of criminal activity
Digital currencies can be used to facilitate criminal activity and widespread use of digital currencies would present an ongoing headache for law enforcement, it says.
Beyond the extra difficulty of catching criminals using virtual currencies, "the ambiguous legal status of virtual currencies also creates problems for law enforcement while framing charges."
"Given the numerous examples of the harms arising from unregulated virtual currency, it is imperative that a comprehensive law on virtual currency is brought forth to prevent these harms."
Monetary policy risks
"Non-official virtual currencies could affect the ability of central banks to carry out their mandates. Central banks cannot regulate the money supply in the economy if non-official virtual currencies are widely used, as these are decentralised. This restricts their ability to stabilise the economy. In addition, cross-border transactions with non-official virtual currencies can violate limits on the inflow and outflow of money, particularly as such transactions happen irreversibly. This compromises another important lever of monetary policy."
Total crypto ban
Given everything, the report recommends a total blanket ban on "unofficial cryptocurrencies", with some very harsh penalties for offenders. Proposed fines range from INR1 lakh to INR50 crores, which is the equivalent of about US$1,500 to US$7.25 million.
Technically, the suggested penalties apply to anyone who mines, buys or acquires cryptocurrency to engage in any of the following. All may include a fine, with slightly different jail terms depending on the offense. The committee recommends that the issuance of cryptocurrencies and the acquisition of cryptocurrencies for investment purposes be treated especially harshly with a minimum prison sentence of no less than one year where applicable.
|Offense||Recommended jail time|
|Making a cryptocurrency payment||Up to 10 years imprisonment|
|Buying, selling or storing cryptocurrency||Up to 10 years imprisonment|
|Providing cryptocurrency-related services to consumers or investors||Up to 10 years imprisonment|
|Trade cryptocurrency with fiat currency||Up to 10 years imprisonment|
|Issuing a cryptocurrency-related financial product||1-10 years imprisonment|
|Using cryptocurrency as a basis of credit||Up to 10 years imprisonment|
|Issuing cryptocurrency as a means of raising funds||1-10 years imprisonment|
|Using cryptocurrency as a means for investment||1-10 years imprisonment|
Feasibility of a total cryptocurrency ban
The reports ponders the feasibility of a total cryptocurrency ban as well, observing that although China saw some mixed results from its cryptocurrency trading ban, it was still more successful than not, based on the severely curbed CNY trading volumes following the ban. Of course, there's still an underground Bitcoin trading scene in the country, and the report also notes that a lot of people are using VPNs to trade from China.
But in this case, India's proposed ban is several orders of magnitude more severe than China's.
China merely bars trading of cryptocurrencies and heavily discourages them in general. But these proposed rules out of India are intended to completely crack down on touching cryptocurrencies in almost any way.
Digital currency privacy enthusiasts will also be interested to note that although the report acknowledges that there are challenges associated with criminals using Tor on Bitcoin networks, there "is evidence" of ways to crack it when used in Bitcoin transactions.
The report also brushes away the possibility of uncontrollable privacy coins by noting that "active research is also in place for de-anonymisation of completely anonymous cryptocurrencies like Zerocoin."
What happens next?
India's speculators appear to have reacted by buying up Bitcoin. According to Coin Dance data, Indian rupee peer-to-peer Bitcoin trading volumes on the largely anonymous Paxful service climbed to new highs in the face of the ban.
After all, it's not illegal... yet.
The committee also recommends that a standing committee be established to monitor "the technological developments globally and within the country and also the views of global standard setting bodies to revisit the issues addressed in the Report as and when required".
A standing crypto committee might be a prudent choice even if the blanket ban comes in because the report itself is already lagging somewhat behind the blockchain state of the art. There's also the possibility of selective reversals as the technology progresses as has been seen in China whose anti-Bitcoin facade has recently started to crack a bit and which is home to many public semi-permissioned blockchain projects that would be outright banned in India under these proposed rules.
That final point bears emphasis.
Why India's cryptocurrency ban is dangerous
India's proposed cryptocurrency ban is unprecedented in its severity and scope, and in its proposed form would inevitably close the door on certain public blockchain innovations. Despite what it's mostly used for, at the end of the day, cryptocurrencies without any express utilities still provide an important degree of network security simply by containing value – speculative as it may be.
In an increasingly interconnected world, it's in absolutely no one's interests for India to fall behind in public blockchain development.
India's cryptocurrency ban slams shut the door on integral parts of blockchain, such as decentralised oracles, public blockchain interoperability solutions and certain applications that are best performed through public blockchains, such as counterfeit pharmaceutical tracking.
Public blockchain in pharmaceutical tracking
India is the world's largest pharmaceutical manufacturer, supplying 20% of the total global demand by volume. But investigations have found that an incredible 75% of the world's counterfeit medications originate in India. If you assume all counterfeit pharmaceuticals are equally lucrative and lethal regardless of where they originate, India's counterfeit pharmaceutical industry is killing at least 75,000 people around the world and netting almost $60 billion for criminals each year.
Even if you subscribe to the most deadly version of Bill Gates' "Bitcoin kills people" argument, there's still no way cryptocurrency can match that kind of body count.
One of the reasons India is such a hub of counterfeit pharmaceutical manufacturing is because corruption and lax law enforcement run rampant, and no amount of regulatory or police action has been able to make a dent in it.
This is precisely why an immutable, tamper-proof and corruption-resistant public blockchain for tracking pharmaceutical supply chains is such a powerful tool. However, this tool requires access to the public cryptocurrency that underpins whatever public ledger is hosting this solution.
The proposed crypto ban would make this kind of solution impossible, and this is one example of how, if it passes, this cryptocurrency ban will indirectly contribute to a lot of deaths.
Per Ajeet Khurana, CEO of Zebpay – a now-global cryptocurrency platform that originated in India:
There’s negative news coming out of India about cryptocurrency. This saddens me as I fear that we are closing the door to innovation.
— Ajeet Khurana (@AjeetK) July 22, 2019
Disclosure: The author holds BNB and BTC at the time of writing.
- SEC crackdown on Binance, Kraken – What it means for Aussie investors
- Sam Bankman-Fried found guilty – what it means for Australian FTX victims
- Bitcoin’s price soars over 10% on ETF rumours – here’s why
- New regulations for Aussie crypto exchanges: What it means for investors
- Sam Bankman-Fried’s FTX trial starts tomorrow – what it means for FTX customers