LIVE NOW

CBA and 17 tonnes of almonds on the Ethereum blockchain

Andrew Munro 30 July 2018 NEWS

Simply having better access to data makes a huge difference.

On the surface, it was a relatively straightforward trial, called Trade-chain. A shipment of almonds was tracked from Mildura, Australia to Hamburg, Germany on the blockchain, facilitated by different parties uploading their data to the Ethereum blockchain in addition to just keeping it in their own silos as usual.

The parties included Olam Orchards Australia whose almonds were being moved, Pacific National for rail haulage, the Port of Melbourne, Patrick Terminals and the OOCL Limited shipping company.

And the results, said Commonwealth Bank (CBA), might well be a foundation for the future of global trade.

"By bringing together partners from across the end to end supply chain and developing a new platform underpinned by emerging technology, blockchain and IoT, we were able to prove a concept to modernise global trade," said Alex Toone, managing director of Global Commodities and Trade at CBA.



What's the difference?

A supply chain is made up of different links, such as Pacific National on the railway and OOCL once the goods are on the ship. This fragmented approach, coupled with legacy systems in which each party only handles information regarding their own link, means it's difficult to get a true end-to-end view of the entire supply chain without data gaps and impossible for all parties to get an easy real-time view of a shipment's current status.

Being able to access this information lets businesses make more agile decisions based on what's actually going on at the time, reduces the amount of time and money spent moving paperwork, allows for ongoing improvements by more easily identifying bottlenecks, letting businesses adapt to problems before they occur and more easily find the cause after they occur, reduce one's reliance on supply chain finance for even more savings and a whole lot more.

Uploading information into a shared database might not sound like a revolutionary breakthrough, but the current status quo involves a lot of flying blind and for each participant to put a lot of trust in all the other links of the chain. As such, part of the reason it's such a breakthrough is that the legacy systems are just so inefficient.

Significantly, with a standard distributed ledger system used by the entire industry, it also becomes much more feasible to just "plug in" new third parties where necessary.

The other part might be that blockchains can theoretically be tamper-proof and can connect parties that don't necessarily trust each other in ways that weren't previously possible, for even more efficiencies and cost savings. For example, an insurer might create an entirely new product that can cover goods as it changes hands across the entire supply chain, rather than each link of the chain needing its own separate insurance to cover goods while they're in its possession.

Simply having access to more information can deliver substantial efficiency benefits, while standardising these systems can compound them.

In the future

But there's still the question of finding the ideal blockchain for this.

CBA used Ethereum, but noted that other options might be better in the future, and that this particular experiment let all parties view the blockchain information which naturally wouldn't work for the real thing going forwards.

"Ethereum currently has the most development activity globally, and offers the functionality we require. However other blockchains are developing rapidly and CBA remains open to other options in the future," the bank said in a statement. "In a future commercial environment the access rights may be more restrictive, allowing participants to protect commercially sensitive information and restrict user access to the relevant information only."

This is CBA's second blockchain supply chain test, with the first being in 2016.

Somewhat ironically, this Trade-chain experiment is Commonwealth Bank experimenting with the kinds of solutions that a tech company would typically provide, while some of IBM's blockchain tests have seen the tech company offer solutions of the kind that a bank would typically provide. Blockchain sure is shaking things up.


Disclosure: At the time of writing, the author holds ETH, IOTA, ICX, VET, XLM, BTC and ADA.

Disclaimer: This information should not be interpreted as an endorsement of cryptocurrency or any specific provider, service or offering. It is not a recommendation to trade. Cryptocurrencies are speculative, complex and involve significant risks – they are highly volatile and sensitive to secondary activity. Performance is unpredictable and past performance is no guarantee of future performance. Consider your own circumstances, and obtain your own advice, before relying on this information. You should also verify the nature of any product or service (including its legal status and relevant regulatory requirements) and consult the relevant Regulators' websites before making any decision. Finder, or the author, may have holdings in the cryptocurrencies discussed.

Crypto explained


Latest cryptocurrency news

Picture: Shutterstock

Latest crypto guides

Ask an Expert

You are about to post a question on finder.com.au:

  • Do not enter personal information (eg. surname, phone number, bank details) as your question will be made public
  • finder.com.au is a financial comparison and information service, not a bank or product provider
  • We cannot provide you with personal advice or recommendations
  • Your answer might already be waiting – check previous questions below to see if yours has already been asked

Finder only provides general advice and factual information, so consider your own circumstances, or seek advice before you decide to act on our content. By submitting a question, you're accepting our Terms of Use, Disclaimer & Privacy Policy and Privacy & Cookies Policy.
Ask a question
Go to site