Build-to-rent should be Australia’s future, property pundit says
Building developments for the sole purpose of renting could help tackle housing affordability problems, a property industry leader has claimed.
Mirvac chief executive and Property Council president Susan Lloyd-Hurwitz has told the QUT Business Leaders’ Forum that a build-to-rent strategy is “something that should exist in Australia”.
“It’s an opportunity to have much more affordable housing,” she said.
Lloyd-Hurwitz said build-to-rent didn’t exist in Australia for a host of reasons, including the low yield caused by tax structures.
“It doesn’t exist as an asset class, but elsewhere in the world build-to-rent is the largest real estate investment asset class,” Lloyd-Hurwitz said. “Investment asset class is the most highly valued income stream in real estate but in Australia, we insist on thinking about it as a capital gain play and that is what stops institutional income-focussed groups from taking on build-to-rent.”
Lloyd-Hurwit urged all levels of government to support the build-to-rent industry. She pointed to the UK, saying build-to-rent did not exist in the country six years ago, but now represents £6 billion in development.
- Out of cycle: How your home loan rate could increase this year, even if the cash rate doesn’t
- Will APRA property regulators ever act to cool house prices?
- First home buyer skips Sydney property for half-price regional home
- Is now a good time to refinance?
- How Australia Post is speeding up home loans