Bitfinex says its so-called “New York customers” are foreign entities

Posted: 23 July 2019 4:45 pm

Picture not described

One of the reasons Bitfinex left the USA in 2017 was to avoid exactly this kind of headache, it says.

Bitfinex/Tether and the New York Office of the Attorney General (OAG) are currently engaged in a high stakes ping-pong match. Here's a recap of the match so far.

OAG alleges that Bitfinex misled customers with claims that Tether is fully backed and argued that due to Bitfinex's recalcitrance, it should be ordered to slow its operations.Bitfinex argues that OAG's allegations were misleading and incorrect, said it had been cooperating fully with the OAG investigation and that a slow-down would be unreasonably disruptive to its business.
The umpire (the court) agrees to take some of the bite out of the OAG request.Bitfinex argues that the case should be dismissed on the grounds that it was not serving New York customers and that Tether is not a security or commodity and that therefore the case is not in the OAG's jurisdiction.
OAG counter-argues that the Bitfinex motion to dismiss is just a delay tactic, that Tether is a security and presents documents that allegedly prove that Bitfinex was serving NY customers.Bitfinex argues that the allegedly New York-based customers are now New York-based entities, that Tether is still not a commodity or a security and that many of the examples provided by the OAG fail to connect Bitfinex's services rendered to the crux of OAG's Tether-related allegations.


"Under Bitfinex's and Tether's Terms of Service, Eligible Contract Participants (ECPs) that transact with Bitfinex or Tether must be foreign entities. Although those foreign entities may have shareholders or personnel who reside in, or otherwise have contact with, the United States or New York, Bitfinex's and Tether's customers are the foreign entities themselves," Bitfinex explains.

"Bitfinex and Tether have no ability to control who the shareholders or personnel of ECPs are at any point in time," it adds.

Similarly, the issues at the crux of the ping-pong match – the temporarily mislaid millions that saw Bitfinex allegedly pull a line of credit from Tether's backing – took place outside New York, and any claims of Tether being fully backed were also made by an entity that was not at the time based in New York.

So as the argument runs, if Bitfinex had nothing to do with New York, and its customers were not based in New York, why is the New York OAG involved?

The parties are due back in court on 29 July.

Regulatory headaches

"The Companies [Bitfinex and Tether] were careful... to avoid doing any business with United States customers," Bitfinex says. "One reason was a concern about a highly uncertain regulatory environment, particularly given that entering the US market could open the Companies to regulation by 50 different states with different agendas. This proceeding is a perfect example of what the Companies, at the cost of losing significant potential business, had intentionally tried to avoid."

In its farewell USA announcement, dated August 2017, Bitfinex said as much.

Picture not described


Also watch

Disclosure: The author holds BNB and BTC at the time of writing.

Disclaimer: This information should not be interpreted as an endorsement of cryptocurrency or any specific provider, service or offering. It is not a recommendation to trade. Cryptocurrencies are speculative, complex and involve significant risks – they are highly volatile and sensitive to secondary activity. Performance is unpredictable and past performance is no guarantee of future performance. Consider your own circumstances, and obtain your own advice, before relying on this information. You should also verify the nature of any product or service (including its legal status and relevant regulatory requirements) and consult the relevant Regulators' websites before making any decision. Finder, or the author, may have holdings in the cryptocurrencies discussed.

Latest cryptocurrency news

Picture: Shutterstock

Get into cryptocurrency

Ask an Expert

You are about to post a question on

  • Do not enter personal information (eg. surname, phone number, bank details) as your question will be made public
  • is a financial comparison and information service, not a bank or product provider
  • We cannot provide you with personal advice or recommendations
  • Your answer might already be waiting – check previous questions below to see if yours has already been asked

Finder only provides general advice and factual information, so consider your own circumstances, or seek advice before you decide to act on our content. By submitting a question, you're accepting our Terms of Use, Disclaimer & Privacy Policy and Privacy & Cookies Policy.
Go to site