Apple iPhone 8 Plus review: Plans | Pricing | Specs

The iPhone 8 Plus is an exceptional handset, and it might even be better than the iPhone X.

When Apple announced its 2017 class of iPhones, the lion's share of attention went to the flagship Apple iPhone X. It's not hard to see why, what with its fresh full screen (if you ignore the notch) design, FaceID features and jaw-dropping asking price.

That left the iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus in a difficult position because in a market that Apple itself hypes up to expect nothing but the best, taking the "lesser" handsets, especially at premium prices, might seem like a dumb move.

Nobody wants to look dumb, but as I've found testing the iPhone 8 Plus, dumb is the last thing you can call this particular handset.

Design

• Much the same as the iPhone 7 Plus
• The glass-coated backing increases the chances of the phone slipping from your fingers

• Read more on the iPhone 8 Plus design

  

  The design of the iPhone 8 Plus is instantly recognisable. Indeed, if you've followed iPhone models in recent years, it's downright familiar, with the front-mounted TouchID home button that's likely to become a relic in the years to come still very much present. Apple produces the iPhone 8 Plus in silver, gold and space grey finishes, with the space grey having a black front bezel and the other two colours opting for a white front bezel.

  I tested the gold version of the iPhone 8 Plus, and while that's not a colour that's personally to my taste, the choice is nice to have. While it's a subtle detail, the new iPhone 8/8 Plus design incorporates a metallic band wrapped around both sides of the phone handset that doubles as the phone's antenna.

  

  Order new Apple iPhone 8 Plus from Dick Smith Electronics

  An all-new glass design, even better camera, and the most powerful chip ever in an iPhone combine to deliver a truly next-gen iPhone experience.

  View details

  From the front, you'd be very hard pressed to notice the difference between the iPhone 8 Plus and 2016's iPhone 7 Plus. It's only when you pick it up and notice the slight weight gain or flip it over to reveal the glass back that you pick up on the very small design changes.

  The glass back gives the iPhone 8 Plus a nice gloss effect, although that's at the predictable cost of it being rather slippery. It also makes it easier to enable the new wireless charging feature, although this is otherwise all but hidden from view.

  In physical terms, the iPhone 8 Plus measures in at 158.4x78.1x7.5mm with a carrying weight of 202 grams. By way of comparison, the iPhone 7 Plus measures 158.2x77.9x7.3mm and weighs 188 grams, which means that if you've got older cases with a little flex, they might fit an iPhone 8 Plus, but any kind of rigid or protective case is unlikely to work.

  Apple's contention is that the glass on the back is "the most durable" found in a smartphone, but that's not a concrete promise that it will never break. A durable iPhone case would be a good idea.

  While it's a familiar design, there's no doubt that iPhones are sold as fashion statements, and this is a statement that somewhat says "last year's clothes rack" rather than something that's on trend right now. How much that matters to you will depend on your particular reasons for buying an iPhone 8 Plus.

  Back to top

Camera

• Only a slight improvement over the camera on the iPhone 7 Plus
• Still impressive both from a hardware and software perspective

• Read more on the iPhone 8 Plus camera

  

  Like the iPhone 7 Plus before it, the iPhone 8 Plus features a dual lens array at the rear with a 12MP f/1.8 wide angle and 12MP f/2.8 telephoto lens, accompanied by a front 7MP camera. Apple's contention is that the improvements in camera sensor size and the inclusion of new "Portrait Lighting" effects for the rear camera give it a leg up on older models as well as on the wider smartphone camera community.

  That's a huge call in the very competitive premium smartphone space of 2017, and it's one that the iPhone 8 Plus only partially lives up to. Apple's camera software pretty much remains the reference mode for every other smartphone manufacturer, and that means that it's easy to use even for novices to get some very appealing photos most of the time.

  The headline feature for the iPhone 8 Plus, which is not found on the iPhone 8's single lens sensor, is the Portrait Lighting effect. This effect allows you to apply different lighting tones to a subject facing directly towards the camera. Apple is careful to note that (at the time of writing) this is a beta effort, and it somewhat shows.

  When Portrait Mode lighting works, it can bring out some superb detail and bokeh, and when it doesn't, you'll be left with a regularly lit shot or something that's weirdly lit or cut, especially if you opt for the stage lighting effects. It may improve over time, but for now if you want the best results, you need your subject looking straight on and wearing a minimum of additional headwear to make sure the focus is correctly detected. As this is in beta at the time of testing, I'd hope it would improve.

  

  The other area where the iPhone 8 isn't the strongest performer against its competition is in very low light situations. That's a scenario where just about every smartphone camera struggles for very obvious reasons. The iPhone 8 Plus is good in low light, but there are other options at its price point that can do a little better. For example, here's a low light shot taken with the iPhone 8 Plus at night:

  

  And here's the same shot taken on a Samsung Galaxy Note 8:

  

  The iPhone 8 Plus has a good take on the plant, but the colours are crisper and there's better light pickup and a lot less noise in the Note 8 shot overall.

  Still, on the whole, the iPhone 8 Plus delivers strong image results in a variety of situations. It's not quite the second coming of smartphone photography that Apple seems to pitch it as, but it's a good performer in a class of very solid smartphone cameras of 2017. Here are some sample shots taken from the iPhone 8 Plus:

  

  Back to top

Performance

• Sets a new standard for smartphone performance
• The ordinary screen resolution leaves something to be desired

• Read more on the iPhone 8 Plus performance

  Apple was quite breathless in regards to the performance of the new A11 Bionic CPU used across the board in its 2017 iPhones at the launch of the devices.

  Typically, Apple has delivered performance that's been on par or slightly better than its Android contemporaries, even when it packs less RAM into its devices thanks to the heavy optimisation it can apply given its control over the iOS. However, it's an interesting move to offer it across the range because it gives scope for all three phones to deliver similar performance. The real question then is how well the A11 Bionic actually performs.

  At an anecdotal level, the iPhone 8 Plus is a fast and responsive smartphone, but it's at the benchmark level that this is made starkly clear. Here's how the iPhone 8 Plus compared against a range of its smartphone contemporaries using Geekbench 4's CPU test:

  Handset	Geekbench 4 CPU Single Core (higher is better)	Geekbench 4 CPU Multi Core (higher is better)
  Apple iPhone 8 Plus	4113	10221
  Samsung Galaxy S8+	2020	6690
  Samsung Galaxy S8	1989	6628
  Huawei P10 Plus	1863	6544
  Nokia 8	1932	6529
  OnePlus 5	1976	6506
  Samsung Galaxy Note 8	2024	6490
  HTC U11	1919	6362
  Sony Xperia XZ Premium	1908	6324
  Apple iPhone 7 Plus	3374	5649
  Huawei 10	1922	5633
  Apple iPhone 7	3452	5599
  LG G6	1810	4228
  Apple iPhone SE	2449	4171
  Google Pixel XL	1629	4051

  I'm used to 2017's mostly-Snapdragon-835-driven 2017 class of Android phones having broadly similar performance, and my expectations were that Apple would match or slightly exceed them. Instead, Apple's delivered performance that sets the new high-water mark and not by a small margin. To be fair, Apple is able to fine tune its iOS to get these kinds of results, but it definitely puts it in the kind of absolute lead position it hasn't quite had these past few years.

  The same story plays out in the 3D space, where Apple's new in-house GPU impresses. Here's how it compares using 3DMark's Ice Storm Unlimited test:

  Handset	3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Result
  Apple iPhone 8 Plus	59205
  HTC U11	40239
  Sony Xperia XZ Premium	40086
  OnePlus 5	39497
  Apple iPhone 7 Plus	37956
  Apple iPhone 7	37717
  Samsung Galaxy Note 8	32277
  HTC U Ultra	29968
  Apple iPhone SE	29276
  Huawei P10 Plus	28491
  Google Pixel XL	28458
  Samsung Galaxy S8	28409
  LG G6	28344
  Samsung Galaxy S8+	28120

  Again, while benchmarks aren't the total picture when it comes to smartphone performance, and the intricacies of Apple's Metal API mean that there's an argument that you can only compare iPhones with iPhones, there's still a huge performance gulf between the iPhone 8 Plus and any other available 2017 handsets.

  The 5.5 inch 1080x1920 display in the iPhone 8 Plus is, by modern smartphone standards, a little ordinary on a specification level, but what Apple has done here is fine tune the actual colour display characteristics of the panel, including Apple's own "true tone" display first seen in the iPad Pro lines.

  This automatically adjusts the white balance relative to your conditions to give a more natural feel to images and a true white balance for stark page elements. It mostly works well, but it's a pretty subtle effect that you really have to drop side by side with an older iPhone to really appreciate at all, which means that while it's nice, it's also easy to miss.

  Back to top

Battery life

• Tremendous battery life that not only trounces other iPhones, but most other premium handsets too
• Support for Qi wireless charging frees you from requiring Apple-approved charging products

• Read more on the iPhone 8 Plus battery life

  Battery life is usually where I can reliably talk about Apple's failings because with few exceptions, it's been the Achilles heel of the iOS world. Put bluntly, most iPhones have had terrible battery life, and even Apple's own statements around the iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus don't inspire confidence.

  Apple claims that the iPhone 8 Plus should have similar battery life to the iPhone 7 Plus, and while that was a handset with acceptable battery life compared to the usual iPhone battery misery, acceptable is a long way from premium.

  The further revelation that Apple had dropped the battery capacity of the iPhone 8 Plus down to just 2675mAh from the 2900mAh battery pack found in the iPhone 7 Plus seemed to suggest that we were once again headed to battery pity city.

  Nobody wants to live in battery pity city, but lots of iPhone users already do.

  However, to stretch that terrible metaphor to its limits, it seems that Apple swerved off the highway into town and sped its way along to... well, I'll let the comparative benchmark tell the story, using Geekbench 3's older battery test:

  Handset	Geekbench 3 Battery Test Duration	Geekbench 3 Battery Score
  Apple iPhone 8 Plus	15:27:40	9276
  Galaxy S8+	14:55:30	8955
  Nokia 8	12:22:10	7421
  Sony Xperia XZ Premium	12:06:40	7266
  BlackBerry KEYone	12:05:00	DNF
  Samsung Galaxy Note 8	12:00:50	7208
  Motorola Moto Play Z 2	11:50:50	7107
  Samsung Galaxy S8	11:47:50	7078
  HTC U11	11:42:40	7026
  Apple iPhone 7 Plus	11:11:20	6713
  Huawei P10 Plus	10:39:50	6218

  Yep, that's an iPhone sitting with the best overall battery life of any handset I've ever tested, hands-down, including phones with significantly larger battery capacities.

  Geekbench 3's battery test is a very linear one, with screen dimming enabled, so it is feasible to run the battery down faster than that in day-to-day use if you really must. Still, I easily lasted through the day without ever once having to reach for a charger, which is an absolute first in iPhone terms. Also, it appears that for the first time ever, Apple has radically under-hyped a key iPhone feature because the iPhone 8's battery life is considerably better than that of the iPhone 7 Plus.

  

  Get the new iPhone 8 64GB from Telstra for $104/month from Telstra deals

  $104 per month for 24 months

  30GB + 20GB bonus data every month

  Unlimited calls to standard local, national and mobile numbers and text

  All for use within Australia. Min cost $2,496 over 24 months.

  View details

  Apple's made a lot of noise about the inclusion of Qi wireless charging in the iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus. It's fascinating to see Apple taking up a genuinely open standard, especially because this means that you don't have to use Apple-approved accessories. Any Qi compatible charger should work just fine. Wireless Qi charging is a little slower than direct-wired charging, but it's a nice feature to finally have on the iPhone line.

  Back to top

Verdict

• Excellent battery life and a more affordable price tag make it a more compelling alternative to the iPhone X
• Not quite remarkable enough to warrant upgrading from the iPhone 7 or iPhone 7 Plus

• Read our full iPhone 8 Plus verdict

  

  Apple doesn't appear to have experienced the huge rush of sales usually associated with the launch of a new iPhone, and it's not exactly hard to see why. Many Apple fans, or those waiting to upgrade from an older iPhone generation, will no doubt be waiting for the even more hyped iPhone X handset to hit the market in early November 2017. For a phone you're likely to keep for a couple of years, that's a sensible option, but it might not be your best option overall when pricing is taken into consideration.

  The iPhone X is markedly more expensive than the iPhone 8 Plus, and while it's likely to have similar (or possibly slightly better) performance, Apple's own suggestions as to its battery life strongly hints that the iPhone 8 Plus might be the battery leader of this year's crop of iPhones. Unless FaceID and that mostly full (but for the notch) OLED display are on your must-have shopping list, the iPhone 8 Plus is highly recommended.

  If you're using last year's iPhone 7 or iPhone 7 Plus, there's a fairly wide performance gulf, but 12 months is still a short stay with a single phone, and there's a strong argument to be had for holding your ground for next year's iPhones. Whether Apple will end up using "iPhone 9" remains to be seen, but there's definitely life in the 7 series for now.

  If, on the other hand, your day-to-day handset is an older generation iPhone and you're ready to upgrade, the differences will be immense, not only in performance but also battery life. Apple never sells itself cheap, and the iPhone 8 Plus commands a premium price (albeit a little lower than the iPhone X), but it's worth it for what is currently the best handset on the market.

  

  iPhone 8 Plus: What the other reviewers say

  Site	Comment	Score
  TechRadar	"This is the phone you want if you can't afford the iPhone X."	N/A
  Wired	"if you want to be part of the future, save your money for now. Then go get an iPhone X and see what’s really coming next."	N/A
  News.com.au	"The ‘Jan Brady of iPhones'."	4 out of 5
  Sydney Morning Herald	"It's definitely not an afterthought to the iPhone X, but a true upgrade to the current iPhone line."	N/A
  CNET	"The iPhone 8 Plus is a superlative phone with a spectacular camera, but wait for the upcoming iPhone X before buying."	8.8 out of 10
  Engadget	"Great choices for people who aren’t ready to forgo the home button."	91 out of 100
  TechCrunch	"If you’re in the market for a new iPhone, I recommend the 8 Plus."	N/A
  The Verge	"If the iPhone X is Apple’s bold vision of the future, the iPhone 8 is Apple making sure everyone else at the party has a nice time too."	8 out of 10

  Back to top

Pricing and availability

Apple iPhone 8 Plus

Premium and polished

While it's not a revolution in iPhone design, the iPhone 8 Plus makes key improvements in battery life and performance. Grab one for yourself on contract through Telstra, Optus or Vodafone, or purchase one outright from participating retailers.

Buy Now

• Apple sells the iPhone 8 Plus outright for $1,229 with 64GB of onboard storage, or $1,479 with 256GB of storage.
• Telstra, Vodafone and Optus also offer the iPhone 8 Plus on a variety of contract plans.